Defending Crisis Pregnancy Centers Against Government Overreach | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Defending Crisis Pregnancy Centers

By Erik Zimmerman1519138800000

Crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) are local, non-profit organizations dedicated to helping people who are facing difficult decisions concerning a pregnancy. They are often faith-based and would never refer for abortions due to their religious and moral beliefs. In fact, their very reason for existence is the exact opposite – to save lives. The ACLJ is proud to defend CPCs against the increasing hostility that they face from abortion-supportive state and local government officials, many of whom receive campaign contributions from Big Abortion.

As noted in a Fact Sheet recently issued by the Charlotte Lozier Institute, CPCs provide free or low cost assistance to millions of women annually, including almost 250,000 free ultrasounds each year along with medical services, education, and referrals. Thousands of people serve 6.5 million volunteer hours at CPCs on an annual basis.

CPCs save taxpayers countless millions of dollars each year, as many of the services that they provide for free—through the work of volunteers and the support of donors—would otherwise have to be provided by government agencies through publicly funded programs. Understandably, many state governments have passed resolutions honoring the invaluable work of local CPCs and also provide referrals to those CPCs.

CPCs have helped to prevent countless thousands of abortions, drawing the wrath of Big Abortion. To the abortion industry, CPCs are the competition – they save lives that Big Abortion could end. With the number of existing abortion clinics continuing to decline, and numerous illegal and unethical acts of abortion providers hitting the news in the past few years, Big Abortion’s profit margin has taken a hit.

Abortion supporters, including elected officials, have gone to great lengths to try to harass, burden, discredit, and shut down CPCs. They have tried everything from publishing lies about what CPCs actually do to enacting laws that violate pro-life centers’ constitutional rights, but their attempts to drive CPCs out of existence have not gone unchecked.

In New York State, the Attorney General, an outspoken abortion supporter, issued a broad, unreasonable subpoena to our client, several CPCs in New York, demanding that numerous categories of documents be turned over. The ACLJ filed a lawsuit and received a decision from a state appellate court holding that the entire subpoena was overbroad; the court invalidated key parts of the subpoena and significantly narrowed the rest of it. This harassment tactic is not new; we successfully defended the same CPCs against similar overreach by the New York Attorney General back in 2002.

In New York City, the City Council passed a law imposing many burdensome and unreasonable requirements upon CPCs. For instance, upon receiving a phone call or meeting a client face to face, a CPC volunteer would be required to immediately give five separate disclaimers, in both English and Spanish, that encouraged the individual to go elsewhere for assistance. The ACLJ represented two CPCs in a lawsuit against the City, and won a unanimous decision striking down most of the law’s requirements. The lawsuit ended in a settlement that leaves the door open to file additional lawsuits should the City enforce the law’s remaining requirements in an unreasonable or unconstitutional manner.

Local governments in Maryland imposed similar burdensome requirements upon CPCs. We filed friend of the court (“amicus curiae”) briefs supporting CPCs who filed lawsuits, and the pro-life centers recently won a decision in their favor.

In California, we represent multiple pro-life centers in a challenge to a state law requiring CPCs to provide clients with information about how they can obtain an abortion elsewhere. The Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to hear a similar lawsuit challenging the law, and we filed a brief explaining why that law is unconstitutional. We also represent a CPC in Hawaii challenging similar unconstitutional requirements.

The ACLJ will continue to fight for pro-life centers in court and elsewhere. The invaluable, charitable work that CPCs provide must be defended against attempts by abortion supporters to regulate them out of existence.

Save Babies at the Supreme Court

Pro Life  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we aggressively battle taxpayer-funded Big Abortion to save babies at the Supreme Court, we urgently need you. Have your gift DOUBLED now. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Pro Life

ACLJ's Important Filing for Pro-life Clients Facing Arrest

By Michelle Terry1543594419691

The ACLJ is asking a federal court to strike down a state law that is being used to arrest pro-life sidewalk counselors, violating their fundamental free speech rights. On November 27th, the ACLJ filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction on behalf of our clients, Anthony Miano and Nicholas Rolland.

read more

Big Abortion’s Warped Logic Just Got Even More Twisted

By ACLJ.org1543246316594

It might be the most twisted attempt to normalize abortion we’ve ever seen. A pro-abortion activist group – appropriately named The Agenda Project – released a puzzling and disturbingly ironic video ad online titled “The Chosen,” which is still going viral today. The video simply features a...

read more

Urging Supreme Court to Protect the Most Defenseless

By Walter M. Weber1542326760000

The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) has filed a friend-of-the-court brief urging the Supreme Court to review an abortion case out of Indiana. The case, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky (PPINK) , involves two provisions of Indiana law that were struck down by the lower...

read more

Piercing Big Abortion’s Shroud of Secrecy

By Erik Zimmerman1541777969588

We have recently joined a motion in an ongoing abortion industry lawsuit asking a federal court to require critical documents concerning Big Abortion’s sale of aborted babies’ body parts to be turned over. In 2015, the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) released a series of videos that showed senior...

read more