“Pro-Choice” Radicals: Gosnell Infanticide Mere “Malpractice” | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Gosnell Infanticide Mere Malpractice?

By Matthew Clark1365992955000

Over the weekend ACLJ Executive Director Jordan Sekulow and I wrote a column for the Washington Post on how the horrors of the Gosnell post-birth abortion trial is exposing the illogic of abortion.

In response, the overwhelming consensus of “pro-choice” readers (aside from the irony of claiming the Washington Post now has a pro-life bias) was that Gosnell’s trial is about “medical malpractice,” not abortion and murder.

Abortionist Kermit Gosnell is charged with capital murder for the horrific slaying of seven newborn infants in his abortion clinic.  That’s right; he is on trial for infanticide, yet the radical Left says this is merely a case of “malpractice.”

One radical leftist summed it up this way:  “The issue has nothing to do with abortion. It is malpractice as several comments have pointed out.”

That’s not pro-choice or even pro-abortion; that’s pro-infanticide.  To them the real travesty of the Gosnell case is that he botched the abortion such that the baby was born-alive.

This is the pro-abortion agenda.  Their mantra continues to be abortion, on demand, even after birth, and without apology.  It’s sick.

The horrors of the Gosnell trial and the “pro-choice” extremists’ response is exposing abortion for what it is.  As we explained in our column:

In what can only be described as a “house of horrors,” abortion provider Kermit Gosnell stands trial in Philadelphia, charged with the grotesque murder of at least seven infants, allegedly born alive after botched abortions only to be brutally killed moments later.

As this nearly month-long trial continues, it paints the stark and unmistakably abhorrent reality of abortion. While the national mainstream media has been all but silent about this trial, the headlines coming from local media coverage have been morbidly graphic. Babies born alive and then allegedly killed in truly barbaric ways.

The details emerging from this trial are too graphic for us to even put into words, yet our society allows this same unspeakable torture of another human being to occur just so long as the baby is still inside the womb.

The Gosnell trial in conjunction with a Planned Parenthood lobbyist’s recent admission that the abortion giant has no issue with this life-ending practice is lifting the veil of secrecy from an industry long shrouded from public scrutiny.

Continue reading and share this article that has pro-abortion radicals so riled up.

Latest in
Pro Life

Urging Supreme Court to Protect the Most Defenseless

By Walter M. Weber1542326760000

The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) has filed a friend-of-the-court brief urging the Supreme Court to review an abortion case out of Indiana. The case, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky (PPINK) , involves two provisions of Indiana law that were struck down by the lower...

read more

Piercing Big Abortion’s Shroud of Secrecy

By Erik Zimmerman1541777969588

We have recently joined a motion in an ongoing abortion industry lawsuit asking a federal court to require critical documents concerning Big Abortion’s sale of aborted babies’ body parts to be turned over. In 2015, the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) released a series of videos that showed senior...

read more

ACLJ Files Lawsuit to Protect Pro-Life Free Speech

By Michelle Terry1541170948318

Today the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) filed a lawsuit in federal court in Iowa on behalf of two individuals, Anthony Miano and Nicholas Rolland, challenging a state statute that infringes upon their right to advocate for the lives of the unborn outside of Planned Parenthood and other...

read more

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Deals Blow to Big Abortion

By Olivia Summers1539956957514

Recently, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a Louisiana law that “ requires abortion facilities to meet basic health and safety standards .” Specifically, the law requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. This is a victory for the lives of unborn babies,

read more