ACLJ CALLS ON SUPREME COURT TO PROTECT RELIGIOUS GROUPS IN LEGAL BATTLE INVOLVING HHS ABORTION MANDATE | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

ACLJ CALLS FOR RELIGIOUS PROTECTION

1452608764580

(Washington, DC) – The American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) has filed an amicus brief asking the Supreme Court to overturn several lower court rulings that would force Little Sisters of the Poor and other faith-based groups to either violate their religious beliefs or pay penalties to the government for failing to obey the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) abortion pill mandate.

In representing nearly 80,000 Americans, the ACLJ brief argues that these groups should receive a religious exemption and not be forced to either violate their beliefs or pay stiff fines for failing to comply with the mandate which would require ministries to sign a document that authorizes the provision of abortion-inducing drugs to their employees.

“The Obama Administration continues to wage its war against faith-based organizations putting religious liberty at great risk,” said Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the ACLJ. “As we argue in our brief, the high court must correct the errors made by the lower courts and overturn these decisions. Failure to do so would have devastating ramifications on groups like Little Sisters of the Poor and others. If these groups are unable to kowtow to the mandate and therefore shut down their operations, in order to remain true to their religious beliefs, the poor and needy will suffer a tangible loss.”
In the case of Little Sisters of the Poor, that group would be forced to pay out millions of dollars a year in fines to the government – money that could be better used by the Sisters in caring for the elderly poor.

“This is not just an abstract, intellectual debate,” the brief contends. “If this Court rules against Petitioners in this case it will leave gaps in our already burdened social welfare system and cripple a vital schoolhouse of civic virtue in our society.”

The ACLJ’s amicus brief is posted here.

In the case of Zubik v. Burwell, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the spring and a decision is expected by the end of June.

Led by Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow, the American Center for Law & Justice focuses on constitutional law, religious liberty, and pro-life issues and is headquartered in Washington, D.C. and online at aclj.org.

Faith Shouldn’t Disqualify You from College

By Carly F. Gammill1495143654646

“It is axiomatic that ‘the government must abstain from regulating [or penalizing] speech when the motivating ideology or the opinion or perspective of the speaker is the rationale for the restriction,” and it is beyond dispute that the government may not “reserve special hostility for those who...

read more

Defending Religious Liberty at Supreme Court

By Walter M. Weber1492721591078

Can the government target churches for exclusion from a child safety program, just because they are churches? That is the question before the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer . The Supreme Court heard oral argument on April 19, and a decision is likely to issue by...

read more

Weinstein, MRFF attacking the Bible…Again…

By Skip Ash1478713610386

The French have an expression that’s right on the mark with respect to the actions of Mr. Michael “Mikey” Weinstein and the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF): Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose (which, freely translated, means, “the more things change, the more they remain the...

read more

Why the Angry Atheists are Wrong

By Skip Ash1478639061192

Every so often, I visit the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) website to see what Mr. Weinstein and his fellow travelers have been up to. When I visited the website on October 31, 2016, I came across a short article entitled, “Our Constitution, Any Religion & the Military,” written by...

read more