2017 Victories: Big Wins for Religious Liberty at the U.S. Supreme Court | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Victory: Big Wins for Religious Liberty at SCOTUS

By ACLJ.org1513087200000

This is the latest installment in a year-end series looking back at a few of the numerous victories by the ACLJ in 2017.

Every year, opponents to religious freedom continue their assault on our First Freedom. This year, the ACLJ successfully helped defend religious liberty in two landmark cases before the U.S. Supreme Court.

In Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) and ACLU tried to strangle church healthcare plans with burdensome government bureaucracy. These radical groups tried to prevent Christian hospitals from invoking a religious exemption to the onerous burdens, claiming that only Churches and not Christian groups could receive a “religious” exemption. We did not let them.

In Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer, the State denied funding to help better protect children who play on a church playground for the sole reason they were a church. We did let that discrimination go unanswered.

The ACLJ filed friend-of-the court briefs in both cases, supporting the religious liberty of the Christian hospital system and church respectively. With these two cases, the Supreme Court has again made it clear that people of faith cannot be treated as second-class citizens. At the ACLJ, we fight to make sure they never are.

While these rulings represent major victories for religious freedom, we face many other impending challeges. With your support, we can continue to help deliver resounding victories for religious liberty in the years to come.

To help the ACLJ continue to have the resources we need to make these victories possible and continue these fights, please consider making a Tax-Deductible donation to the ACLJ through our year-end Matching Challenge. Your gift will be DOUBLED dollar-for-dollar through the end of the year.

You can read more in the ACLJ’s 2017 Victories series here.

Donate
$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

Take action with the ACLJ as we continue fighting for life and liberty. Make a tax-deductible gift today.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

Under Attack Again in Federal Court

By Geoffrey Surtees1511978140620

As explained here , the Trump administration issued Interim Final Rules last month regarding religious and moral exemptions under the HHS abortion-pill mandate. For years, we fought for the government to provide these conscience protections. The previous administration’s campaign to force religious...

read more

MRFF Attacks a Christian, The Chaplains’ Flag

By Wesley Smith1511975032084

In the latest attack by Mikey Weinstein and the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF), the target is not only the United States military (MRFF’s venomous specialty) but is also an attack on history, in this case the history of the Korean War. At Maxwell Air Force Base in Alabama, there is a...

read more

Christian Realtors Face Government Discrimination

By ACLJ.org1510936124128

Government regulators are at it again. They have issued complaints against Christian realtors who run their business in accordance with their faith. Instead of protecting our constitutional rights, the government insists on silencing Christians and singling them out for discrimination. We have...

read more

ACLJ Files at Supreme Court Supporting Prayer

By Michelle Terry1510345558355

The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) today filed an amicus curiae brief – friend-of-the-court brief – at the Supreme Court of the United States in support of legislative prayer. In the case Rowan County, North Carolina v. Lund , we are asking the Court to support the county’s request to...

read more