Search  |  Login  |  Register

Tyranny of the Abortion Pill Mandate

By Matthew Clark1350337354000

Challenges against President Obama’s abortion-pill mandate continue to grow, as people all across America stand up against this blatant violation of religious liberty.

The premise behind the HHS Mandate is quite simple. All employers, religious or otherwise, must provide health insurance for their employees that covers contraceptives and abortion pills. In other words, regardless of your faith, you must pay for abortion pills.

For the millions of Americans who believe that we are all created in God’s image, that life begins at conception, and that we are commanded by God to protect life, this mandate to pay for abortion pills directly violates our religious liberty.

As we stated it in one of our recent amicus briefs, “Thus, the Mandate presents all Christian employers with a stark choice: obey Caesar, or obey Christ.”

It was the view of our Founding Fathers that no American should ever be forced to make this unconscionable choice – the “choice” to violate God’s laws or be punished by government.

Our nation’s first President, George Washington, made it clear that such a “choice” could never be supported under our Constitution and that our government would never be able to violate the religious liberty of the American people in this way. In 1789 he wrote:

If I could have entertained the slightest apprehension that the Constitution framed in the Convention, where I had the honor to preside, might possibly endanger the religious rights of any ecclesiastical Society, certainly I would never have placed my signature to it; and if I could now conceive that the general Government might ever be so administered as to render the liberty of conscience insecure, I beg you will be persuaded that no one would be more zealous than myself to establish effectual barriers against the horrors of spiritual tyranny, and every species of religious persecution.

As the ACLJ, on behalf of Christian business owners, Members of Congress, religious institutions, and hundreds of thousands of Americans, challenges the HHS Mandate in court, our argument is quite simple.

The HHS Mandate, by requiring people of faith to provide abortion-pill coverage, “imposes a substantial burden on [their] free exercise of religion by coercing [them] to choose between conducting their business in accordance with their religious beliefs or paying substantial penalties to the government.”

Both the Constitution and federal law, through the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), prohibit the government from infringing upon that most sacred right of religious liberty that we have all been endowed with by our Creator.

The ACLJ has now filed two lawsuits on behalf of private business owners whose faith is violated by the abortion-pill mandate. We have also filed amicus briefs in numerous other challenges to the mandate around the country.

The mandate has become a serious affront to the religious liberty of many faith traditions. We represent 79 Members of Congress, filing amicus briefs in a dozen cases on behalf of Catholic institutions and charities, including notable institutions such as the University of Notre Dame, and we have also recently filed an amicus brief on behalf of Regent University in a challenge brought by an Evangelical Christian college.

Thus far, over 100 plaintiffs have brought challenges to the HHS Mandate’s violation of religious liberty, and more continue adding by the day.

It is clear that the American people oppose this unconstitutional religious liberty violation. Regardless of the status of this litigation, the next President of the United States has the opportunity to end this Executive Branch regulation on his first day of office. Join thousands of others in by signing our petition to the candidates to end the abortion-pill mandate.

Latest in
ObamaCare

ACLJ Opposes New HHS Mandate Regs

By Geoffrey Surtees1413905016065

Today, the American Center for Law & Justice filed formal comments in objection to the administration’s latest efforts to see to it that both non-profit and for-profit groups continue to kowtow to the HHS Mandate. (The HHS Mandate, adopted pursuant to Obamacare, is that collection of rules and...

read more

Efforts Against Abortion Pill Mandate

By Edward White1412607468142

Litigation generally takes a long time before a case is finally resolved. Despite the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby decision this past summer, ruling that the HHS Mandate violates the religious exercise rights of for-profit businesses and their owners who oppose having to pay for abortion pill...

read more

Obama Repackages Abortion-Pill Mandate

By Matthew Clark1408738939000

The Obama Administration is not one to let a mere Supreme Court decision get in the way of its radical pro-abortion agenda. After losing major abortion-pill mandate litigation at the Supreme Court and then failing in an attempt to ram a new abortion-pill mandate through Congress (where it couldn’t...

read more

Another Win in HHS Mandate Litigation

By Edward White1407812800000

Over the past few years, the ACLJ has represented numerous businesses and their owners in seven lawsuits challenging the HHS Mandate, which requires businesses to include in their health plans coverage for contraception, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drugs in order to avoid crippling...

read more