Imagine if your job could force you to murder an innocent person.
Recently we told you that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) proposed a rule to protect that fundamental medical principle called “Protecting Statutory Conscience Rights in Health Care.” The rule ensures “that persons or entities are not subjected to certain practices or policies that violate conscience, coerce, or discriminate, in violation of such Federal laws.”
While this would be a huge win for the pro-life movement here at home, medical associations in other countries are considering a decidedly different, unsettling direction for medical professionals.
The World Medical Association (WMA) – the international organization representing physicians and cooperating with the World Health Organization (WHO) – is close to adopting a new text that would contradict its established missions and goals.
At their recent WMA Council Session in Latvia a proposal entitled “Declaration on Medically-Indicated Abortion” was discussed, that suggested disturbing revisions to their ethical policy statements.
Under these proposed changes, a physician could actually be forced to cooperate in, if not actually perform abortion procedures, even if it was against their will. Not only would the rights of innocent unborn babies be disregarded, but doctors who currently have the right to choose not to perform abortions without consequences to their practice would be forced to commit murder.
Our European office, the European Centre for Law and Justice (ECLJ), is actively involved in this situation. The ECLJ sent a letter to all members of the WMA, imploring them to “oppose the draft Declaration and to instead reassert the obligation of the States to guarantee the independence of physicians and to protect human life.” As stated in the letter:
According to its own website, the WMA was created to “ensure the independence of physicians” and it “has and continues to extend its help and influence on behalf of physicians who are being hindered in applying ethical practices.” That is why, the WMA has always considered that coercion is not legitimate to impose to physicians a collaboration on some practices violating their conscience.
The letter went on to point out this declaration would result in a direct violation of their rights as doctors to refuse to perform or participate in procedures they don’t personally agree with:
[T]he proposal of a new “Declaration on Medically-Indicated Abortion” sets out some exceptions in which physicians would be forced to refer women to professionals performing abortions or even to perform abortions themselves. This endorsement of a coercion of physicians by the States violates their independence and their freedom of conscience.
It is a slippery slope to allow medical associations to force physicians to act against their own consciences under any circumstance. Aside from violating their rights, it could compromise safety for the patient, particularly if the physician is forced into an unfamiliar procedure. Under this declaration, it would be guaranteed that someone would not leave the operating room alive.
At the ACLJ we’re fighting for the free speech of pro-life advocates Big Abortion is trying to silence. We've taken on more than half a dozen massive pro-life cases across the country, each of which could end up at the Supreme Court. We have a chance to cripple Big Abortion, cut their funding, and save countless innocent babies.
No doctor should be forced to violate his own conscience and take an innocent life. We will continue to monitor this WMA proposal and are prepared to take further legal action if necessary.
As we take our most critical legal action for life globally, we need your Tax-Deductible support. Have your gift DOUBLED to defend babies. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.
After a nearly two-month trial, on November 15th, a San Francisco jury ruled against David Daleiden, the Center for Medical Progress (CMP), its former board members, including our client, and the investigators in Planned Parenthood v. Center for Medical Progress . This is the case filed by Planned...
We at the ACLJ are constantly fighting for the unborn. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we discussed a series of cases we are engaged in, fighting for the unborn and Virginia’s new abortion constitutional amendment. A lot of these cases have huge ramifications but we’re looking at the first case on the...
This is going to be a major showdown at the Supreme Court against the abortion industry, as the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a big abortion related case – a case we urged the Court to take. Months ago we told you how we filed an amicus brief at the Supreme Court of the United States in Gee v.
You may have seen this past week headlines from a variety of news outlets loudly proclaiming the death of conscience rights: “ Trump’s ‘conscience rule’ for health providers blocked by federal judge .” “ Second federal judge strikes down Trump’s ‘conscience protection’ rule for health care...