Back to Court to Defend NYC Crisis Pregnancy Centers | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

By Jay Sekulow1307557571000

We went back to federal court today in New York City in an effort to put a stop to the enforcement of a flawed - and we believe - an unconstitutional law, approved by New York City Council and signed into law by Mayor Bloomberg.

As you recall, we filed a federal lawsuit last month on behalf of numerous crisis pregnancy centers in New York City challenging the constitutionality of this new ordinance that targets crisis pregnancy centers.

Today, we filed a motion for preliminary injunction urging the court to block enforcement of this troubling law.

Our lawsuit, filed last month in federal court, contends that the ordinance violates the constitutionally protected rights to freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and association, freedom of the press, and due process of law, guaranteed to our clients by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, as well as the New York Constitution.

The ordinance requires crisis pregnancy centers to post signs in the lobbies of their counseling centers, add extensive additional written language to their advertising materials, and to provide oral statements during both in person and telephonic conversations regarding the services offered by crisis pregnancy centers.

Our argument is clear:  The Supreme Court has said, on numerous occasions, that the right to freedom of speech includes both the right of a speaker to choose his own preferred message, and the right not to speak a message with which the speaker disagrees.

The fact is that New York Citys ordinance strikes at both of these important components of the right to free speech.  First, it selects which individuals and groups will be targeted based on their chosen message. Second, it coerces crisis pregnancy centers, on pain of forced closures and fines, to express the Citys messages.

We filed our lawsuit last month in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, which is posted here.  The motion for a preliminary injunction is posted here.

We represent The Evergreen Association (Expectant Mother Care Pregnancy Centers-EMC Frontline Pregnancy Centers) and Life Center of New York (AAA Pregnancy Problems Center) which operate a total of 13 crisis pregnancy centers across New York City.

Our attorneys will be back in court June 7th for a hearing on the motion for the preliminary injunction.  We will keep you posted.

 

Latest in
Pro Life

ACLJ Back in Court Against Big Abortion

By Erik Zimmerman1534513356179

Just over three years ago, the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) released a series of videos that shocked the conscience of the American public, showing senior abortion providers openly discussing illegal practices such as profiting from the sale of the body parts of aborted babies and altering...

read more

Planned Parenthood's Deceptive Campaign

By ACLJ.org1533733200000

Big Abortion is launching a massive propaganda campaign to activate its supporters and attack life. Planned Parenthood has rolled out an online initiative it calls “Unstoppable” – featuring pro-abortion artists and celebrities, and urging its supporters to sign an abortion “manifesto.” The intent...

read more

ACLJ Files in Support of Law Defunding Planned Parenthood

By Laura Hernandez1533140507114

The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) has filed an amicus brief with the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit defending an Ohio law that prohibited taxpayer dollars from flowing to abortion providers. The law bars organizations that provide and advocate for abortion from participating in...

read more

ACLJ Urges HHS to Adopt Pro-Life Rule

By Olivia Summers1533064040137

In May, we informed you about a proposed rule by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that would prevent taxpayer funded grants through Title X from being given to organizations, such as Planned Parenthood, that provide abortion services. If adopted, this rule will cut...

read more