The President of the United States just issued a Presidential Proclamation beginning enhanced vetting procedures of foreign nationals seeking entry into the United States. This proclamation fulfills the promise of his March 6, 2017 Executive Order 13780 titled, “Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States.”
The President’s March executive order began the first ever “worldwide review” of foreign countries in U.S. history. This review included nearly 200 countries and evaluated them on three simple criteria: 1) their willingness and ability to give the U.S. necessary information to identify those coming into the U.S.; 2) their willingness and ability to identify the security risks posed by their nationals and provide that information to the U.S.; 3) the national security risks posed by the nation and its nationals to the U.S. and it citizens.
This proclamation, grounded in incontrovertible evidence, enacts the results of this historic review of U.S. security policy. Of the nations evaluated, eight countries have been deemed “inadequate” or a risk to U.S. national security: Chad, Iran, Syria, Libya, Somalia, North Korea, Venezuela, and Yemen. These travel restrictions are permanent until these countries become compliant with the simple baseline laid out above.
Although Iraq failed to meet the baseline requirements, the President exempted them from travel restrictions because of their commitment and cooperation in the ongoing war against ISIS. Similarly, Sudan was removed from the earlier travel pause because of its compliance with the baseline standards set out above.
It is important to note, however, that the remaining travel restrictions are not absolute. They differentiate between those seeking to come to the U.S. permanently, “immigrants,” and those just coming to visit, conduct business, and seek a better education, “nonimmigrants.” Likewise, the Venezuela restrictions do not target the country’s innocent civilians but only the corrupt and noncooperative government officials who insist on obstructing U.S. information gathering requests.
These new measures are proof that the United States is not interested in indiscriminately banning entry into the United States. Each nation is evaluated on its own merits.
Absurdly, the radical ACLU still calls these common-sense travel restrictions on dangerous nations (including North Korea and Venezuela) a “Muslim ban.” It is threatening a new round of dangerous lawsuits that could leave America vulnerable.
Over 90% of the Muslim world remains free to travel to the United States subject to these newly enhanced vetting procedures. North Korea and Venezuela are hardly Muslim majority nations. In the coming days, the President will likely make similar changes to the ongoing refugee pause.
The President is not targeting Muslims or any other “class” of persons. He is implementing a well informed and evidence based immigration and border security policy. He is choosing to make the tough choices needed to protect the U.S. and its citizens from foreign terrorists.
The ACLJ has fought for these precise, evidence based travel restrictions from the very beginning. We have consistently defended the President’s travel restrictions before hostile lower courts. Despite their efforts, the President continues to seek reform and security. Enhanced vetting, especially in the form of simple in person interviews, is a vital and common-sense part of screening incoming foreign nationals. This proclamation is just the logical next step.
The United States Supreme Court agreed with our legal arguments, allowing the Executive Order to be implemented as it considered the case. Now, in light of the new enhanced and focused Executive action, the Supreme Court has just suspended oral arguments on the President’s Executive Order. The high Court has ordered new briefing on this latest development in the travel restriction case, due in the coming days.
Propelled by our unshakable belief that the Constitution is not a suicide pact, the ACLJ has filed briefs in multiple courts already in support of the President’s Executive Order. We will do so again if the ACLU and other radical leftists again challenge the security of our nation. With your continued support the ACLJ can continue to defend these constitutional and common-sense actions to keep our nation safe.
As we aggressively fight to protect our national security and Christians, we urgently need your support. Defend America & Christians today.
Who would have thought just a few short years ago that both Democrats and Republicans, who saw securing our southern border as an important issue and a point of agreement between the two parties, would be in a political battle over the matter? As the President and GOP members of Congress call for...
The historic five-hour meeting between President Trump and North Korea’s Kim Jong Un ended with a signed agreement between the two leaders. It is not a treaty, as it does not contain any details as to implementation or a way forward in order to bring about the general goals in the signed agreement.
As the planned summit between the United States and North Korea was on, then off, and now on again, President Trump acknowledged that the phased dismantling of North Korea’s nuclear weapons program was a possibility. Many in the media latched onto this as a reversal of the President’s pledge that...
Last week, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments concerning the legality of President Trump’s National Security Proclamation . The Proclamation, issued in September, fulfilled the promise of President Trump’s March 6, 2017 National Security Executive Order. The March 6th...