This is the latest installment in a year-end series looking back at a few of the numerous victories by the ACLJ in 2017.
From Day One, the ACLJ has consistently and successfully maintained that the President has both the constitutional and statutory authority to issue his Executive actions to keep America safe from jihadist terror.
The President’s Executive actions did two common sense things: first, it temporarily denied entry to foreign nationals from a number terrorist hotbed nations and paused entry of all refuges; second, it ordered relevant departments to assess, develop, and implement enhanced vetting procedures, including in-person interviews for admission into the U.S. – policies we have advocated for years.
According to leftist State governments and radical organizations like the ACLU, these simple policies are somehow constitute a “Muslim ban” and violate the Establishment Clause. In addition to mischaracterizing the Executive actions, they pretend that the Constitution is a suicide pact, giving a right of free entry to all who wish to enter and do harm.
The ACLJ defended these common sense actions at every turn. We filed numerous amicus briefs before federal district courts, federal appeals courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court. Eventually, despite the decisions of few activist judges, the Supreme Court has consistently rebuffed the lower courts and upheld the Executive actions, dismissing two of the cases.
Recently, the President issued a new Executive Proclamation, implementing new vetting procedures and new travel restrictions on eight countries, including Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, Somalia, Yemen, Chad, Syria, and Libya, based on hard evidence of their susceptibility to terrorist infiltrators. Yet, the Left persisted in their baseless and delusional claims.
Once more, we filed numerous amicus briefs and once again the Supreme Court overruled the lower courts, allowing the Proclamation to go into full effect as these cases continue on appeal. We will continue to aggressively defend the President’s authority to protect our nation, the Constitution, and the rule of law.
The ACLJ remains committed to the safety and security of our nation and the rule of law. With your support, we will continue to defend the Proclamation as we did the national security Executive Order.
To help the ACLJ continue to have the resources we need to make these victories possible and continue these fights, please consider making a Tax-Deductible donation to the ACLJ through our year-end Matching Challenge. Your gift will be DOUBLED dollar-for-dollar through the end of the year.
You can read more in the ACLJ’s 2017 Victories series here.
Chip in today and double your impact.
Take action with the ACLJ as we continue fighting for life and liberty. Make a tax-deductible gift today.
Who would have thought just a few short years ago that both Democrats and Republicans, who saw securing our southern border as an important issue and a point of agreement between the two parties, would be in a political battle over the matter? As the President and GOP members of Congress call for...
The historic five-hour meeting between President Trump and North Korea’s Kim Jong Un ended with a signed agreement between the two leaders. It is not a treaty, as it does not contain any details as to implementation or a way forward in order to bring about the general goals in the signed agreement.
As the planned summit between the United States and North Korea was on, then off, and now on again, President Trump acknowledged that the phased dismantling of North Korea’s nuclear weapons program was a possibility. Many in the media latched onto this as a reversal of the President’s pledge that...
Last week, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments concerning the legality of President Trump’s National Security Proclamation . The Proclamation, issued in September, fulfilled the promise of President Trump’s March 6, 2017 National Security Executive Order. The March 6th...