U.N. Official for Religious Freedom Agrees with ACLJ in Defense of Pro-Life Conscience Rights | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

UN Agrees with ACLJ on Pro-Life Rights

By Olivia Summers1458327124801

Today, medical professionals around the globe are being forced to violate their consciences or be ostracized and banned from their profession.

For years, the ACLJ has defended the right of medical professionals to not violate their conscience and to be free to object to participating in an abortion – in any form. We have defended and supported the right of freedom of conscience for pharmacists, doctors, and businesses, and continue to advocate for that right internationally.

Just last week, the United Nations (U.N.) Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief. Professor Bielefeldt, agreed with the ACLJ’s position that medical staff have the right to contentious objection. In an event hosted by our European affiliate, the European Centre for Law and Justice (ECLJ), Professor Bielefeldt discussed several international human rights laws, and advocated that these laws protect the right of medical professionals to object to participating in abortions.

“All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.” So states Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Professor Bielefeldt argued that we must look at the foundations for human rights and the law of morality to understand the importance of the right of conscientious objection. As stated in the UDHR, conscience is at the core of humanity. It is at the foundation of human rights, and is “closely interwoven with human dignity.” 

Professor Bielefeldt further argued that recognizing “conscience” means “respecting . . . all human beings and their potential of responsible agency. And that [it] is something we must ascribe to everyone, and respect in everyone.”

Laws “derive their legitimacy from human dignity; from respect for every human being in their dignity.” Thus, laws that require medical professionals to violate their consciences and perform an abortion are not legitimate. Instead, they disrespect and devalue the very core of human dignity – conscience.

No person should be forced to choose between their humanity and their profession. They should be free to practice humanity in their profession. 

This is the core argument we have been making across the globe in defense of the most basic human right – life. It is a powerful statement that your advocacy has reached the top echelons of the U.N., and that a senior U.N. official has publicly stood in solidarity with our pro-life efforts.

We here at the ACLJ continue to stand up for freedom and human dignity. We fight to protect reason and conscience. We aggressively advocate for life. Stand and fight with us.

Latest in
Pro Life

Abortion-Related Businesses to “Permanently Close”

By Edward White1513093058281

From Day One , the ACLJ has been aggressively calling for Congress and federal and state law enforcement to investigate Big Abortion for the horrific practice of selling aborted babies’ body parts (fetal tissue) for profit. It’s illegal, but until recently has gone on unhindered from the fear of...

read more

Planned Parenthood Under DOJ Investigation

By Michelle Terry1512764518767

In confirmation of news we brought you not long ago, it has now been verified by multiple news outlets that the Department of Justice is, in fact, investigating Planned Parenthood and its illegal practices, such as profiting from the sale of aborted fetal tissue. The Chairman of the Senate...

read more

ACLJ Files Second Abortion-Pill Mandate Amicus Brief

By Geoffrey Surtees1512748800000

This week, the ACLJ filed a second amicus brief in support of the Administration’s recently issued Interim Final Rules granting religious and moral exemptions to the HHS abortion-pill Mandate. Our first brief was filed last week in the case of Pennsylvania v. Trump . Like Pennsylvania, California...

read more

ACLJ Official Comments About Abortion-Pill Mandate

By Geoffrey Surtees1512494683962

When the Obama Administration first sought to coerce religious organizations, family-owned businesses, and non-profit advocacy groups into facilitating the provision of morally objectionable drugs and services (including abortion pills) as part of ObamaCare, the ACLJ took action. In addition to...

read more