Supreme Court Grants Review in Abortion Case | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

By Jay Sekulow1306153470000

With all the discussion last week about the issue of judicial nominations, not enough attention was paid to the Supreme Courts granting review in a major abortion case.  Last Monday, the Supreme Court issued an order granting review in a parental notification case concerning abortion out of the state of New Hampshire.  This is the most significant abortion case the Court has taken in nearly five years.  At issue is New Hampshires parental notification statute.  This statute simply requires that parents be given notice of an abortion being performed on a minor child.  The New Hampshire statute does not go so far as other states that actually require parental consent.  Nevertheless, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that the parental notification statute was, in fact, unconstitutional. 

 

In granting review, the Supreme Court has made the determination that the issue of parental notification raises significant constitutional questions.  Specifically, the Court is going to address what legal standards should be applied in addressing any restrictions on abortion.  What is interesting, however, is that this is not really an abortion restriction case as there is nothing in the statute that prohibits any abortion from taking place.  Simply put, the statute, like those in 32 other states, only requires that notification be given to parents regarding abortions to be performed on their minor children. 

 

Several years ago, we had a case out of Pennsylvania where a school district arranged for an abortion to take place on a minor child in New Jersey.  The school district actually arranged for the funding and transportation of the minor child across state lines in order for the abortion to take place.  Pennsylvania had a parental notification statute, and New Jersey did not.  This case sparked a national outcry regarding parental notification statutes and resulted in legislation being adopted in 32 states. 

 

We are also establishing today the formation of a Committee to Protect Life.  This Committee will actually sign on to the brief that is filed at the Supreme Court of the United States.  To find out how you can sign on to this important Committee and obtain a copy of our brief, please visit www.aclj.org.  I have already assembled a senior research team to prepare the necessary legal documents.  For updates on this and other cases, check out the www.aclj.org website.

Latest in
ACLJ

ACLJ Top Org. in "Positive Cultural Change"

By ACLJ.org1495126839927

The ACLJ has been named as the top organization for “Positive Cultural Change in the U.S.” in a recent survey. The survey of politically engaged Christians across the U.S. conducted by the American Culture & Faith Institute asked respondents “to identify the organizations they believed to have been...

read more

Cut Taxes & Let Americans Keep More Money

By Harry G. Hutchison1493310721750

Yesterday, the Trump Administration outlined an auspicious tax-reform proposal that puts American jobs, industry, and the American people first. This proposal is designed to jumpstart the economy from its current sluggish growth trajectory of 2 percent to a more robust 3-4% annual growth. It...

read more

Time for Leadership That Puts America First

By Harry G. Hutchison1493132644392

As Congress returns to Washington, D.C. after its two-week recess, it faces several urgent challenges that provide opportunities for practical and principled leadership. The time for courageous conviction and innovative leadership sacrificially serving all of the American people is now. In the...

read more

Secretary Carson, M.D., Begins to Heal HUD

By Anna Sekulow1489011139393

Renowned pediatric neurosurgeon and former presidential candidate, Dr. Ben Carson was confirmed on March 2nd as the nation’s 17th Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). After an undue delay in the Senate’s vote on Dr. Carson, only 6 out of 46 Democrats...

read more