Will Roe Go? | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

By Jay Sekulow1309027420000

Yesterday I was in our office in Washington, DC, discussing with some of our senior staff the laws passed in South Dakota and soon to be passed in Mississippi regarding the elimination of abortion in those states except when the life of the mother is at stake.  The frustration of states and the will of the people on the abortion issue cannot be overstated.  For far too long, the courts have dismissed even minor restrictions on abortion as unconstitutional.  Whether its parental notice or now the partial-birth abortion cases, the issue of life is front and center in America. 

 

The fact is that there is probably (and I underscore probably) only four votes on the Supreme Court that would overturn Roe v. Wade.  Justices Thomas and Scalia have already voiced their opposition to the Supreme Courts decision in Roe.  Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito will be dealing with their first substantive abortion case in the partial-birth abortion case to be argued next term at the Supreme Court.  It takes five votes to overturn a Supreme Court precedent; and while Justice Kennedy has been supportive of restrictions in the partial-birth abortion context, he also co-authored an opinion which reaffirmed the right to abortion recognized in Roe v. Wade.

 

Since I am a strategist and one who deals with the Supreme Court on a regular basis, I know that we would have a difficult time at this point in seeing Roe v. Wade overturned.  But all that could change with the shift of Court personnel.  If, in fact, there were five votes for Roe to be overturned, the lack of an exception for rape or incest may become a factor.  President Bush has indicated that he does not support the South Dakota law because it does not have an exception for rape or incest.  Others within the pro-life community have expressed similar concern.  Part of a Supreme Court case is the atmospherics that a fact pattern creates.  In order to see Roe v. Wade overturned and the issue returned to the states, an exception for life of the mother, rape and incest would certainly make a more suitable vehicle for the Court. 

 

Yet the frustration of the states and the people of these states is clear.  There is a growing consensus to protect the life of the child in utero.  This is a good thing for America.  I believe we are going to be successful in the partial-birth abortion cases.  In that context, however, we are going to need everyones help.  I encourage you to click here to see how you can join with us in this effort. 

 

The Supreme Court under John Roberts has issued twice as many unanimous opinions so far than the Rehnquist Court.  I think this bodes well for us.  We were pleased with the unanimous decision in the parental notice case, and I was gratified with the unanimous decision in our RICO case.  I am optimistic that while we may not see a unanimous decision in the partial-birth abortion case, I do believe we are going to carry the day and see this hideous practice put to an end. 

Latest in
Pro Life

Planned Parenthood Ally Fights to Fund Big Abortion

By ACLJ.org1505329200000

Planned Parenthood – the largest abortion provider in America – has a new ally in Negative Population Growth, Inc., or “NPG.” Described as an “anti-immigrant environmentalist group,” NPG “promote[s] concepts such as ‘the two-child family,’” and “lowered rates of migration to the United States.”

read more

The Right to Life is Not the Right to Kill

By ACLJ.org1505307600000

Following the horrific violations of human rights that occurred during World War II, much of the world recognized the importance of establishing laws to protect the inherent right to life of all persons. As such, Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) states ,

read more

Court Rejects Planned Parenthood Suit

By Edward White1504011600000

Planned Parenthood—the largest abortion provider in the country, which was founded by the eugenicist Margaret Sanger —was on the losing end in an appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals over Arkansas’s decision to terminate Planned Parenthood as a Medicaid provider, a decision that would...

read more

Iceland “Cures” Down Syndrome with Eugenics

By ACLJ.org1503334870740

Iceland has embraced eugenics to develop an icy “cure” for Down syndrome: abortion. Armed with state funded prenatal screening and the goal “ to educate ,” for nearly a decade, Iceland has facilitated the death of “ every single…fetus with Down syndrome… ” According to a recent series of reports...

read more