The ACLJ Files Brief in Critical Case Involving Discrimination Against Christian Schools | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Critical Case Involves Discrimination of Christian Schools

By Laura Hernandez1570822502017

Last week, the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed an amicus brief with the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Carson v. Makin, a case challenging the State of Maine’s discrimination against Christian schools.

In Maine, there are not enough public secondary schools, especially in rural areas. The state therefore has created a program called the “town tuitioning system.”  The way it works is that state funds are used to pay tuition for students at the private school of their choice – unless the school is religious. A Maine statute provides that state tuition funds are not available for “sectarian schools.”

In 2004, the First Circuit Court of Appeals had upheld that statute against a Free Exercise Clause challenge even though the Free Exercise Clause has long been understood to prohibit discrimination on the basis of religious status in distribution of public benefits. For example, a state cannot allow public school students free admission to public museums but charge Christian school students who want to visit the same museum.

Since the First Circuit’s 2004 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer, 137 S. Ct. 2012 (2017), that a Church daycare center could not be excluded from a state grant program providing playground surfacing materials. Trinity Lutheran calls into serious question the First Circuit’s decision upholding the Maine statute forbidding state tuition funds from going to religious schools. (We also filed an amicus brief at the Supreme Court in the Trinity Lutheran case.)

In the brief we filed last week with the First Circuit, we contend that Maine’s anti-discrimination law should not be used to support the state’s discriminatory exclusion of religious schools from receiving state tuition monies.

[T]here can be no dispute that applying [Maine’s anti-discrimination law] would, at a minimum, raise serious constitutional questions. Any requirements that condemned as “discrimination” a religious school’s adherence to its mission integrity, and in particular to religious doctrines on sexuality and human nature, would essentially put the religious school to the choice of changing its doctrines or disqualifying itself from otherwise available public benefits. To condition participation in public programs on such sacrifice of religious identity very likely violates the First Amendment protections for speech and religion.

This Term, the Supreme Court will be hearing Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, a case also involving a school choice program which similarly discriminated against religious schools.  With your support we filed an amicus brief arguing that the Montana program violated the Free Exercise Clause because it disfavored otherwise eligible private entities solely on the basis of their religious identity or activities.

It is possible the First Circuit will wait until the Supreme Court has ruled in Espinoza before deciding Carson v. Makin.  But if the First Circuit adheres to its flawed interpretation of the Free Exercise Clause, the ACLJ will be prepared to file additional briefing in support of en banc review.

Stop Forcing Churches to Disregard Their Faith

Religious Liberty  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we aggressively take legal action to protect churches from being forced to disregard their faith, have your gift DOUBLED today to defend religious freedom. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.

Fighting to Keep Holy Days Sacred Even at a Major Corporation

By Geoffrey Surtees1591884708830

For many religious believers, asking their employer not to work on a holy day (Sundays for Christians, the Sabbath for Jews, etc.) is more than just a matter of personal preference; it is a religious obligation arising from Scripture and its admonition to keep holy days sacred. Keeping the Sabbath...

read more

ACLJ Obtains Key Ruling in Our Case to Defend a Church Ministry

By Abigail A. Southerland1591711995644

We’ve got a positive update in our case to defend a church from unlawful discrimination. A federal court has ruled that the ACLJ, on behalf of the Christian ministry it represents, can move forward with its lawsuit against a county in Georgia challenging the discriminatory zoning process engaged in...

read more

What Are Churches’ Rights During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

By Abigail A. Southerland1590163715698

There is no doubt that the current national COVID-19 crisis has required the imposition of extraordinary measures. These measures have required countless businesses, churches, and gathering places to close, and naturally raise concerns regarding the preservation of civil liberties and religious...

read more

ACLJ Aggressively Presses Forward in "Jesus Loves You" Lawsuit

By John Monaghan1587128400000

Our defense against the Left’s assault on free speech and religious liberty continues, virus or no virus. We told you about how we filed lawsuit on behalf of our client, Hadassah Carter. She is a realtor who has been being harassed, targeted, and discriminated against by the Virginia Real Estate...

read more