Supreme Court Rules: Little Sisters Live to Fight Another Day | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Supreme Court Ruling on Little Sisters

By Geoffrey Surtees1463422676912

The Supreme Court announced its decision today in the HHS Mandate challenges involving, among others, the Little Sisters of the Poor.  After years of litigation in the lower courts, as well as oral arguments and multiple rounds of briefing before the Supreme Court itself, the Court unanimously announced that the numerous challenges against the HHS Mandate by religious organizations will be sent back to the lower courts in order for the parties to try to reach a compromise.  The Court wrote that the challengers and the government “should be afforded an opportunity to arrive at an approach going forward that accommodates petitioners’ religious exercise while at the same time ensuring that women covered by petitioners’ health plans ‘receive full and equal health coverage, including contraceptive coverage.’”

Just as the Court’s order requesting supplemental briefing one week after oral argument was an unusual move by the Court, so too is today’s order.  The Supreme Court typically issues rulings of law, not orders for parties to attempt to settle their differences.

Nonetheless, today’s order is something to celebrate.  Not only did the Court refuse to give the Administration the total victory it was seeking, the Court vacated the rulings of the numerous lower courts that ruled in favor of the Administration.  Those courts held that the so-called “accommodation” scheme concocted by the Administration does not substantially burden the beliefs of religious organizations -- despite the fact that those organizations believe that the “accommodation” forces them to perform actions directly contrary to those beliefs.  Left undisturbed -- let alone affirmed by a Supreme Court decision -- those decisions would have been a terrible precedent for the future of religious liberty in this country.  Moreover, as we argued in our amicus brief submitted to the Court, a ruling against the Little Sisters would have been disastrous to religious nonprofits that supplement burdened government programs and thus play a critical role in helping those who cannot help themselves.  Religious groups should not have to pay annual financial penalties to the government just to act according to their religious beliefs.  Why can’t this Administration see that such money would be better spent helping those in need?

While the Court did not address the merits of the cases in todays’ order, including whether the HHS Mandate imposes a substantial burden on religious exercise, there can be no doubt that the Court is taking the religious and legal positions of these nonprofit organizations very seriously.  It was not willing to rule in favor of the Administration’s paltry understanding of what constitutes religious liberty, nor its restrictive reading of what the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act requires.  Most importantly, the Court held that the Administration may not impose financial penalties on the Little Sisters and others until these cases are ultimately resolved.

Whether the Administration will agree to a compromise that does not force groups like the Little Sisters of the Poor to compromise their religious beliefs remains to be seen.  We will continue to monitor these cases as they go through additional rounds of briefing and argument in the lower courts and keep you posted.

Defeat the Abortion-Pill Mandate

Religious Liberty  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we file a major Supreme Court amicus brief to defeat the abortion-pill mandate, take and have your gift doubled today. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.

ACLJ Stands on the Law In Response To MRFF Attacks

By Skip Ash1531490400000

I must confess that I am an unabashed fan of Yogi Berra. In his own inimitable way, he was a master at re-formulating the English language. He could encapsulate more common sense in one, often humorous, stream-of-consciousness quote than almost anyone I know of. My choice for today is: “It’s déjà

read more

Regulating a Couple’s Religious Use in Their Own Home?

By Abigail A. Southerland1530540000000

Many churches, religious organizations and homeowners engaged in religious activity are unaware of the federal laws that protect their religious exercise from unnecessary and burdensome zoning regulations and/or unequal treatment in the zoning process. The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized...

read more

Equating Christians in Uniform with Jihadists

By Skip Ash1527602400000

In yet another unhinged rant , Mr. Michael L. “Mikey” Weinstein, founder and president of the inaptly named Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF), has once again claimed that the sky is falling in the U.S. military. And, once again, he has moronically equated sharing the Gospel of Jesus...

read more

ACLJ Helps Protect First Amendment Rights of Student

By ACLJ.org1526652935299

“In our system, state-operated schools may not be enclaves of totalitarianism. School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. . . . [S]tudents may not be regarded as closed-circuit recipients of only that which the State chooses to communicate. They may not be confined to...

read more