Impeachment Update: Democrats Attempt PR Stunt (Sekulow Recap) | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion


The House impeachment managers attempt a ridiculous PR stunt.

Today on Sekulow, we are discussing the pre-hearing publicity stunt by Lead House Impeachment Manager Congressman Raskin and the other House managers in the impeachment proceedings. They tried to call President Trump as a witness.

This is going to be a really interesting week coming up. Of course, we’ve got the political trial of a former President of the United States. I’m calling it a political trial instead of an impeachment trial, because while it’s the trial of a former president, it is not the trial of “THE President” as the Constitution requires. That distinction raises serious constitutional issues as the U.S. Senate does not have jurisdiction to try a private citizen.

Congressman Jamie Raskin, the lead impeachment manager, sent a letter addressed to former President Trump that reads:

As you are aware, the United States House of Representatives has approved an article of impeachment against you for incitement of insurrection.

It goes on to say:

Two days ago, you filed an Answer in which you denied many factual allegations set forth in the article of impeachment. You have thus attempted to put critical facts at issue notwithstanding the clear and overwhelming evidence of your constitutional offense. In light of your disputing these factual allegations, I write to invite you to provide testimony under oath, either before or during the Senate impeachment trial, concerning your conduct on January 6, 2021. We would propose that you provide your testimony (of course including cross-examination) as early as Monday, February 8, 2021, and not later than Thursday, February 11, 2021. We would be pleased to arrange such testimony at a mutually convenient time and place.

Then they essentially threatened President Trump by basically saying that if he declines the invitation to testify, they will reserve the right to make an adverse inference based on that.

President Trump’s impeachment attorneys, Bruce Castor and David Schoen, replied to Congressman Raskin with the following:

We are in receipt of your latest public relations stunt. As you certainly know, there is no such thing as a negative inference in this unconstitutional proceeding.

Your letter only confirms what is known to everyone: you cannot prove your allegations against the 45th President of the United States, who is now a private citizen.

The use of our Constitution to bring a purported impeachment proceeding is much too serious to try to play these games.

That was an appropriate response by President Trump’s impeachment attorneys. Again, President Trump is now a private citizen and the Senate cannot not try a private citizen.

On Monday, we also plan to publish and send our own legal analysis to the Senate on the unconstitutionality of the impending trial. We’ll keep you updated as the Senate trial starts next week.

We also discussed a major pro-life case that we’re working on that will be going to trial in April or May. And in the middle of all of this, we’ve also got another lawsuit beging filed today, involving a Freedom of Information Act request we submitted regarding Congressman Eric Swalwell (an impeachment manager) and the Chinese spy scandal.

The full broadcast is complete with much more discussion by our team on the letter Congressman Raskin sent to President Trump’s impeachment legal team as well as their response. You’ll want to play close attention next week to our analysis, as no one understands impeachment proceedings better than we do.

Watch the full broadcast below.

Stop Unconstitutional Impeachment Trial

Constitution  Signatures


Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

Make this a monthly Tax-Deductible gift.

Our legal team is mobilizing on Capitol Hill, filing a critical legal analysis with the Senate to defend the Constitution and stop this unconstitutional impeachment trial. Donate today.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from the ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Radical Left

President Biden Projects Weakness Ahead of Putin Summit

By Jordan Sekulow1623705651568

As President Biden is wrapping up his first overseas trip as President of the United States, he is portraying himself and the United States as weak. One of the outcomes from the summit has been to let China get a free pass for the leading theory that COVID-19 was leaked out of a lab in Wuhan,

read more

Out of Touch: VP Harris's Aides "Panicked" Over Border Assignment

By Jordan Sekulow1622580752122

In April, America witnessed the highest number of migrants illegally crossing our Southern border in history. U.S. border patrol agents encountered 178,622 migrants during that month alone. Vice President Kamala Harris’s team has gone into panic mode as leaders on both sides of the aisle are...

read more

UNMASKED: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's Latest Hypocrisy

By Logan Sekulow1621627593063

We’re starting to see mask mandates being lifted around the United States as more Americans are getting vaccinated. However, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi refuses to remove the mask mandate from the House Chamber, despite the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updating their...

read more

Policies Have Consequences: Five Things You Should Know

By Wesley Smith1621346340000

One often hears the statement, “Elections have consequences.” That political aphorism is such a given, it reminds me of another one from my Army career: “That is a blinding flash of the obvious!” However, just as important and true is this maxim: “Policies have consequences.” Whatever the motives...

read more