Impeachment Update: Democrats Attempt PR Stunt (Sekulow Recap) | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

The House impeachment managers attempt a ridiculous PR stunt.

Today on Sekulow, we are discussing the pre-hearing publicity stunt by Lead House Impeachment Manager Congressman Raskin and the other House managers in the impeachment proceedings. They tried to call President Trump as a witness.

This is going to be a really interesting week coming up. Of course, we’ve got the political trial of a former President of the United States. I’m calling it a political trial instead of an impeachment trial, because while it’s the trial of a former president, it is not the trial of “THE President” as the Constitution requires. That distinction raises serious constitutional issues as the U.S. Senate does not have jurisdiction to try a private citizen.

Congressman Jamie Raskin, the lead impeachment manager, sent a letter addressed to former President Trump that reads:

As you are aware, the United States House of Representatives has approved an article of impeachment against you for incitement of insurrection.

It goes on to say:

Two days ago, you filed an Answer in which you denied many factual allegations set forth in the article of impeachment. You have thus attempted to put critical facts at issue notwithstanding the clear and overwhelming evidence of your constitutional offense. In light of your disputing these factual allegations, I write to invite you to provide testimony under oath, either before or during the Senate impeachment trial, concerning your conduct on January 6, 2021. We would propose that you provide your testimony (of course including cross-examination) as early as Monday, February 8, 2021, and not later than Thursday, February 11, 2021. We would be pleased to arrange such testimony at a mutually convenient time and place.

Then they essentially threatened President Trump by basically saying that if he declines the invitation to testify, they will reserve the right to make an adverse inference based on that.

President Trump’s impeachment attorneys, Bruce Castor and David Schoen, replied to Congressman Raskin with the following:

We are in receipt of your latest public relations stunt. As you certainly know, there is no such thing as a negative inference in this unconstitutional proceeding.

Your letter only confirms what is known to everyone: you cannot prove your allegations against the 45th President of the United States, who is now a private citizen.

The use of our Constitution to bring a purported impeachment proceeding is much too serious to try to play these games.

That was an appropriate response by President Trump’s impeachment attorneys. Again, President Trump is now a private citizen and the Senate cannot not try a private citizen.

On Monday, we also plan to publish and send our own legal analysis to the Senate on the unconstitutionality of the impending trial. We’ll keep you updated as the Senate trial starts next week.

We also discussed a major pro-life case that we’re working on that will be going to trial in April or May. And in the middle of all of this, we’ve also got another lawsuit beging filed today, involving a Freedom of Information Act request we submitted regarding Congressman Eric Swalwell (an impeachment manager) and the Chinese spy scandal.

The full broadcast is complete with much more discussion by our team on the letter Congressman Raskin sent to President Trump’s impeachment legal team as well as their response. You’ll want to play close attention next week to our analysis, as no one understands impeachment proceedings better than we do.

Watch the full broadcast below.

Stop Unconstitutional Impeachment Trial

Constitution  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

Our legal team is mobilizing on Capitol Hill, filing a critical legal analysis with the Senate to defend the Constitution and stop this unconstitutional impeachment trial. Donate today.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Radical Left

Democrats Declare War on Conservative Media (Sekulow Recap)

By Jordan Sekulow1614203754909

The Democrats in Congress declare war on conservative media, specifically, conservative TV. Today on Sekulow , we discussed two Democrat Congressmen sending a letter to the CEO’s of major cable providers asking if they will be deplatforming Fox News, Newsmax, and OAN. We’ve seen social media...

read more

Allies of CA Governor Newsom Unveil Plan To Block Valid Recall

By Richard A. Grenell, Special Advisor for National Security and Foreign Policy1613771088688

Gavin Newsom could be in the political fight of his life. The California Governor, who political operatives in the Golden State believe is on a path to become President, is facing a serious Recall effort that could derail his political ambitions. The grassroots activists spearheading the Recall...

read more

Impeachment Week: Political Theater Begins (Sekulow Recap)

By Jordan Sekulow1612823964618

Unfortunately, it is impeachment week and the political theater has begun. Today on Sekulow , we discussed the impending impeachment trial of President Donald Trump which begins tomorrow and that we are delivering the ACLJ’s legal analysis on the unconstitutionality of the trial to the Senate...

read more

Senate Impeachment Trial Schedule Announced (Sekulow Recap)

By Jordan Sekulow1611610690796

We have a date for when the U.S. Senate will take up the impeachment trial of former President and private citizen Donald J. Trump. Today on Sekulow , we discussed the fact that we now have a date for the start of the Senate impeachment trial. They are moving ahead with the impeachment trial of...

read more