Removing Big Abortion’s Cloak of Invisibility | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Big Abortion’s Cloak of Invisibility

By Francis J. Manion1440444914933

The abortion industry in this country could not thrive as it does without the cover of secrecy provided by both the media and, in many cases, government officials more interested in protecting a powerful political ally than the lives of those upon whom that ally preys.

The recent and ongoing undercover videos of Planned Parenthood employees bargaining for human body parts over wine and chicken salad sickeningly illustrate what has been going on for years beneath a well maintained veil of secrecy. It’s no wonder that those who engage in these ghoulish practices howl with outrage whenever anybody even tries to expose their deeds. It’s bad enough that powerful elites in the media connive at this secrecy; but it’s scandalous when government itself lends its offices to the conspiracy.

For several years now, we at the ACLJ have been representing one person who has sought to lift the veil on the abortion industry in the State of Maryland. As we reported previously, here, and here, Andrew Glenn was spurred to action in 2012 after reading horror stories about minimally qualified - in some cases actually unlicensed in other states - abortion practitioners who were allowed to fly under the radar in his state, wreaking havoc on unsuspecting women, causing them serious injury and even death (a disturbing a deadly trend being documented nationwide).

Following the state’s enactment of new regulations designed to tighten up oversight of these places by the state’s Health Department, Glenn filed a simple, routine Public Information Request. His Request asked for the names of the owners, administrators, and medical directors of each of Maryland’s licensed abortion facilities. (At least three of the facilities are owned by Planned Parenthood).  Given the Department’s history of turning a blind eye to the abortion industry, Glenn wanted do his own research and cross-check the information contained in publicly filed licensure applications against regulatory records in other states.

But instead of welcoming Glenn’s efforts to assist them in their oversight, the Department denied him access to the information he sought.

They then went to court in Baltimore seeking judicial approval of their stonewalling. The Baltimore Circuit Court sided with the Department and we appealed to the Maryland Court of Special Appeals. After that court too ruled in the Department’s favor, we filed a petition for certiorari with the state’s highest court, the Maryland Court of Appeals. The vast majority of such petitions are routinely denied without comment. But we’re pleased to report that this past Friday the Court of Appeals granted our petition. This means we will now make our arguments to Maryland’s highest Court.

We will ask the Court to recognize once and for all that the state’s Public Information Act – indeed, the public’s right to know - does not contain an exception for the abortion industry.

We anticipate that the case will be argued later this year or early in 2016, with a decision some time next Spring.

Latest in
Pro Life

NARAL Sees Life as the Competition

By ACLJ.org1531145560658

Big Abortion is irate because Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers are using technology to steal their business and save babies. According to a recent report , the radical abortion group NARAL Pro-Choice America is livid with search engine Google for allowing pro-life advertisements, resulting in users being...

read more

ACLJ Files Support for Babies with Down Syndrome

By Michelle Terry1530547200000

On Friday, June 29, 2018, the American Center for Law & Justice filed an amicus curiae brief – a “friend of the court” brief – at the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Preterm-Cleveland, et al. v. Lance Himes, et al . We filed our brief on behalf of the ACLJ and our Committee to Defend...

read more

Pro-Life Centers Can’t Be Forced to Promote Abortion

By Geoffrey Surtees1530030093744

Today, in a 5-4 decision , the United States Supreme Court held that California cannot conscript pro-life pregnancy centers into mouthing a government-dictated message motivated by that state’s pro-abortion ideology. This is a resounding victory for the First Amendment right to free speech and the...

read more

Planned Parenthood Challenge to Arkansas Law Rejected

By Edward White1529071200000

Recently, the Supreme Court rejected a challenge brought by Planned Parenthood against an Arkansas law requiring abortion pill providers to contract with a physician who has hospital admitting privileges. Planned Parenthood had successfully convinced a trial court to grant an injunction against the...

read more