Radio Recap: President Trump Cuts Planned Parenthood Funding by $60 Million | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

After a new Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) rule and victories in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals against Planned Parenthood, President Trump is set to cut $60 million dollars in taxpayer funding from the abortion giant’s budget.

Today on Jay Sekulow Live, we discussed a big victory for life, as according to HHS, Monday, August 19th is the first deadline for Title X recipients to provide “assurance and action plan documenting steps to come into compliance” with the new rule stripping abortion providers of Title X funding.

In March, the Trump Administration finalized the administrative rule by HHS to defund Planned Parenthood’s abortion business of up to $60 million dollars in taxpayer funds.

That was then challenged in Federal Court in California and Oregon, which is of course in the 9th Circuit. In a surprise ruling, the 9th Circuit in a 3 judge panel and then in an en banc order ruled against Planned Parenthood and FOR the Trump Administration, allowing them to cut Planned Parenthood out of Title X funds. We filed amicus briefs in these cases, and the court agreed with our reasoning.

Title X grants were never supposed to be used for abortion, but as we’ve told you, that hasn’t stop Planned Parenthood in the past:

The Title X Family Planning program is a federal grant program dedicated to providing low-income families and individuals with family planning and preventive health services. It was never intended to fund abortions in any way.

Yet, until now, Planned Parenthood has managed to get its hands on about $60 million dollars of Title X funding every year by convincing HHS to administer the program in a way that is inconsistent with the law. In fact, Planned Parenthood has accounted for as much as 41% of the services funded by Title X.

The new rule requires Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers to completely separate its abortion businesses from its taxpayer funded services. That would mean housing its family planning services in separate buildings with separate staff from its abortion services. Essentially creating two separate entities.

But instead, Planned Parenthood chose abortion and thought it could fight the rule in court. But it lost.

When the Trump Administration first proposed this new rule a year ago, we took action, submitting public comments in support of defunding Planned Parenthood. We also asked ACLJ members to take action and submit their own comments. You responded in droves, submitting over 13,000 individual comments. In fact ACLJ members accounted for 10% of all comments received by HHS. That’s incredible.

Together we fought back against Planned Parenthood and taxpayer funded abortion on demand, and we won. 

You can listen to the full episode here.

Defund Millions from Planned Parenthood

Pro Life  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

We’re taking on the abortion industry at the Supreme Court and fighting to defund Planned Parenthood. Your gift - of any size - will be DOUBLED to save lives. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Pro Life

Supreme Court Review of Life Saving Law We Supported

By Jordan Sekulow1574093985453

This is going to be a major showdown at the Supreme Court against the abortion industry, as the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a big abortion related case – a case we urged the Court to take. Months ago we told you how we filed an amicus brief at the Supreme Court of the United States in Gee v.

read more

Beware the “Fake News” on Conscience Rights

By Francis J. Manion1573749691541

You may have seen this past week headlines from a variety of news outlets loudly proclaiming the death of conscience rights: “ Trump’s ‘conscience rule’ for health providers blocked by federal judge .” “ Second federal judge strikes down Trump’s ‘conscience protection’ rule for health care...

read more

Presidential Harassment Case Heads to Supreme Court

By Jay Sekulow1572994506594

On today’s Jay Sekulow Live , we talked about two different cases. The first, being the fight over the President’s taxes likely heading to the Supreme Court. The second, being the ACLJ’s fight for American soldiers before the ICC. The U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in favor of...

read more

New Testimony & Video Undercuts Planned Parenthood’s Case

By Matthew Clark1571947714307

Two big things happened this week in our trial against Planned Parenthood. One of the Defendants majorly undercut Planned Parenthood’s case, explaining what he thought Planned Parenthood “bought all of, was this business model that runs directly contrary to the federal law in fetal tissue sales.”

read more