ACLJ Files Amicus Briefs in Support of New Federal Regulations Defunding Millions from Planned Parenthood | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

ACLJ Supports Regulations Defunding Planned Parenthood

By Laura Hernandez1555515045356

The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) has filed amicus briefs defending the “Protect Life” federal regulations defunding millions of dollars from Planned Parenthood.

As we’ve previously explained, the “Protect Life” regulations prohibit the use of Title X money “to perform, promote, refer for, or support abortion as a method of family planning.”  Title X is a federal program dedicated to providing preconception family planning services to the nation’s neediest citizens.  When Title X was passed in 1970, Congress required that no Title X funds be used to promote abortion.  But that is not how the program has been run.

Thanks primarily to pro-abortion presidential administrations, abortion has been promoted in Title X programs. And for at least two decades, Planned Parenthood has operated Title X clinics in order to promote abortion to Title X patients who are pregnant. In fact, in many cases, Planned Parenthood operates Title X clinics in the same building where it performs abortions. In essence, Planned Parenthood uses Title X funds to subsidize its abortion operations.  No wonder Planned Parenthood does not want that lucrative arrangement to end.

Twenty-one pro-abortion states and the District of Columbia challenged the regulations in Oregon federal court. In another Oregon lawsuit, Planned Parenthood joined the American Medical Association. And in California federal court, the state of California sued. Why so many lawsuits against the Protect Life regulations? Because even though there is absolutely no legal basis for these suits, the Plaintiffs are desperately hopeful that at least one of the courts will issue a nationwide injunction preventing the regulations from going into effect on May 3, 2019. 

Once the regulations go into full effect, in order to obtain what has amounted to nearly $60 million a year, Planned Parenthood will no longer be able to promote or refer for abortions, and they will also have to establish completely separate facilities: no more using Title X funds to pay the rent and utilities on the abortion facility. Planned Parenthood says that it cannot afford to separate its Title X facilities from its abortion facilities so they will stop their Title X services.

That is exactly what the ACLJ and our members want. We filed an amicus brief in the Oregon and California lawsuits pointing out how meritless the pro-abortion Plaintiffs’ legal arguments are.  Although Plaintiffs challenged the Protect Life regulations, we argued in our brief – filed on behalf of more than a quarter million of our members – that:

Plaintiffs’ real quarrel is with Congress’s requirement that Title X program participants cannot use abortion as a method of family planning.  Title X grantees who also operate abortion clinics have benefitted for 19 years from the 2000 regulations which permit the abortion industry to share facilities, staff and resources with Title X grantees and those grantees to enrich the abortion industry by promoting, through referrals and counseling, abortion as a method of family planning. 

None of the Plaintiff States or their Title X provider networks are entitled to Title X funds if they are unwilling to cooperate with federal policy favoring childbirth over abortion by disassociating Title X projects from the abortion industry. And none of the Plaintiffs should be permitted to enlist the federal courts into commandeering continued access to federal taxpayer monies just because many Title X projects have been successfully promoting abortion as a method of family planning for almost two decades.

We also argued that a Supreme Court case that upheld nearly identical regulations during President Reagan’s administration required that the Plaintiffs’ claims be rejected.

The courts will hear oral argument on the Plaintiffs’ Motions for Preliminary Injunctions within the next two weeks.  If Plaintiffs lose, they will certainly appeal to the Ninth Circuit.  And with your help we will file another amicus brief defending the Protect Life regulations and turning off the spigot funneling taxpayer dollars to Planned Parenthood.

Defund Millions from Planned Parenthood

Pro Life  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we take on the abortion industry at the Supreme Court and fight to defund Planned Parenthood, we urgently need your support. Donate to defend life.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Pro Life

Federal Court Win for Pro-Life Nurse Discriminated Against

By Francis J. Manion1578521117530

A few months ago we told you about our lawsuit on behalf of a pro-life nurse in Indiana who was turned down for a faculty position at Indiana University South Bend (“IUSB”). Our client, Cynthia Isabell, was denied a full-time faculty job at IUSB for which she was eminently well-qualified after...

read more

5 Fast Facts: Debunking the Abortion Safety Myth

By Walter M. Weber1578330729708

For years, the abortion industry and its proponents have insisted that abortion is very safe, even safer than childbirth. One problem: this is a myth, a woefully unsupported myth. Contrary to this myth, abortion – the deliberate interruption of the natural, healthy physical process of pregnancy by...

read more

Who is Masterminding Virginia's Abortion Amendment?

By Matthew Clark1577115810607

The ACLJ just filed a new FOIA records demand to help expose the abortion lobby’s lie that abortion is safe and should be a constitutionally protected right. The abortion machine is trying to tear up pro-life laws in our country state by state to extend its grip and “ double down ” on abortion.

read more

Sixth Circuit Court to Rehear Babies with Disabilities Case

By Michelle Terry1576857048663

As we first told you about here , the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit heard the case Preterm-Cleveland v. Lance Himes . The American Center for Law & Justice filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the parties asking the Court to overturn the lower court and allow the state of Ohio to...

read more