Court of Appeals Stays Injunctions Against New Federal Regulations Defunding Planned Parenthood | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Court Stays Injunctions Against Defunding Regulations

By Laura Hernandez1561404603178

Late last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit stayed three injunctions against the “Protect Life” federal regulations defunding Planned Parenthood - delivering a major blow to Planned Parenthood and states challenging the overhaul. As we explained earlier, the “Protect Life” regulations prohibit the use of Title X money “to perform, promote, refer for, or support abortion as a method of family planning.”  Title X is a federal program dedicated to providing preconception family planning services to the nation’s neediest citizens.

As we reported here, three leftist district courts issued injunctions against the regulations, essentially thumbing their noses at an earlier Supreme Court case, Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173 (1991), which upheld nearly identical regulations issued by President Reagan’s administration. The district courts agreed with Planned Parenthood and 21 pro-abortion states who strongly objected to the regulations because they terminated Planned Parenthood’s use of taxpayer funds to promote abortion to poor pregnant women.

The U.S. Department of Justice appealed to the Ninth Circuit, and asked the court to stay the injunctions until the court could hear the merits of the case.  The court agreed that all three injunctions were unlawfully issued and that the district courts had wrongly disregarded Rust v. Sullivan.

The ACLJ filed two amicus briefs pointing out just how wrong the district court decisions were. In both briefs we argued that the District Court’s reasons for ignoring the Supreme Court’s decision in Rust were without merit.  “Just as Appellees cannot prevent Congress from repealing Title X, they cannot coerce perpetual access to federal funds if they are unwilling to cooperate with the federal policy reflected in the Final Rule – favoring childbirth over abortion.”  “In the Supreme Court upheld HHS’s authority to promulgate regulations virtually identical to the [“Protect Life”] Rule. The district court was free to disagree, but it was not free to flout binding Supreme Court precedent.”

The Ninth Circuit’s ruling was a significant preliminary victory, but the fight is far from over. The ACLJ will continue its support of the government’s defense of the regulations, even if, as is likely, the case goes all the way up to the Supreme Court of the United States. With your continuing support, the day will hopefully come when Planned Parenthood does not get another dime of taxpayer money to subsidize its abortion mills.

Defund Millions from Planned Parenthood

Pro Life  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we take on the abortion industry at the Supreme Court and fight to defund Planned Parenthood, we urgently need your support. Donate to defend life.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Pro Life

Radio Recap – Is There Room in the Democrat Party for Pro-Lifers?

By Jordan Sekulow1581634317899

Is there any room left for pro-life voters in the Democrat Party? On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we discussed, because of Senator Amy Klobuchar’s comments , the question of whether or not pro-life voters are welcome in the Democrat Party. Senator Klobuchar said on ABC: Well first, I say this; I’m...

read more

Trump Admin Declares California’s Abortion Action Illegal

By Walter M. Weber1580425019669

The government of California apparently prides itself on being pro-abortion. They filed a brief opposing even the modest regulation of abortion at issue in the current Supreme Court case of June Medical Services v. Gee (we filed a brief of our own exposing the dangers of abortion ). They tried...

read more

President Trump Makes Historic Appearance at March for Life

By Jordan Sekulow1579887900000

From the beginning of his Presidency, President Trump has committed his Administration to protecting life. He has already made good on that promise time and time again, but now he has made history, standing up for the voiceless unborn at our nation’s largest annual pro-life rally. President Trump...

read more

Virginia’s Legislative Majority Proposes Alarming Abortion Laws

By Jordan Sekulow1579701600000

Virginia’s new radical pro-abortion legislative majority wasted no time in attempting to enact their Planned Parenthood sponsored agenda, proposing an amendment to codify abortion in Virginia’s Constitution. Not only that, but they are proposing a slew of bills designed to eliminate key pro-life...

read more