Congressional Panel Continues to Expose Corrupt Big Abortion | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Since October 2015, the United States House of Representatives’ Select Investigative Panel on the Transfer of Fetal Tissue has been investigating Big Abortion.

The Panel was created soon after the release of a number of undercover investigative videos by the Center for Medical Progress (CMP). These videos uncovered extensive evidence in the abortion industry of a willingness to engage in, and actual engagement in, criminal and unethical practices with regard to the sale of fetal tissue (read: aborted baby parts).

The American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) represents a former CMP board member in two federal lawsuits filed by abortion groups. In one of those cases, a federal court has prevented CMP from revealing what it learned during its investigation of the National Abortion Federation. We have appealed that ruling, which is now under review by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

The Chairman and Majority Members of the Panel last week released an 88 page interim update of its work. Here is a summary of what the Panel has uncovered during the past nine months and what it plans to investigate further:

The Panel learned that StemExpress (a fetal tissue procurement business) and three abortion clinics (Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, Planned Parenthood Shasta Pacific, and Family Planning Specialists Medical Group) have committed systematic violations of HIPAA (a federal privacy rule that protects a person’s health information). These violations took place when the clinics disclosed personal health information to StemExpress to assist its efforts to obtain aborted baby parts for resale. The Panel also determined that StemExpress may have violated the law, in part, by using invalid consent forms to obtain the fetal parts from women undergoing abortions. In early June, the Panel sent referral letters to the appropriate federal agencies for further action on these matters.

The Panel also learned that the University of New Mexico and Southwestern Women’s Options, a New Mexico abortion clinic, have systemically violated the law regarding fetal tissue transfers. These violations took place when university personnel procured fetal tissue (for example, the brain, heart, or lung of an aborted child) from the clinic’s patients for research purposes. In late June, the Panel issued a criminal referral to the Attorney General for the State of New Mexico to investigate this matter further. The Panel will continue to investigate the relationship between abortion clinics and schools such as Colorado State University, the University of Minnesota, and the University of Washington.

As the Panel moves forward, it will investigate late term abortion providers to ensure that they are complying with the law. The Panel explained that during late term abortion, infants are sometimes born alive. The abortion providers are obligated to give these infants each of the protections guaranteed by law to all persons. But, “pressure from research institutions or procurement companies to provide human fetal organs and tissue at late gestations could negatively impact the treatment born-alive infants receive. Infants with congenital health problems are particularly vulnerable to neglect or abuse.”

Lastly, the Panel refutes the claimed positive medical results of fetal tissue research. The Panel points out that in “nearly 100 years of research, fetal tissue has not been directly linked to a single medical cure.” Mainstream science now uses adult stem cells in research studies rather than human fetal tissue, thus seriously bringing into question the claim that fetal tissue research is necessary for the advancement of science.

The Panel’s work is one more light exposing the ugliness of Big Abortion. We will continue to keep you posted on what the Panel’s investigation reveals, in addition to the ACLJ’s vital pro-life work.

Update 7/26/2016: A Texas judge dismissed the remaining criminal charge against the investigative journalists at the Center for Medical Progress today after the district attorney admitted that the indictments must be dismissed.  This is a significant victory for pro-life investigative journalists and anyone else concerned about constitutional freedoms.

Stop Harvesting Aborted Babies’ Organs

Pro Life  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

We're aggressively battling in Congress and in federal court to defeat Big Abortion. Your gift - of any size - will be DOUBLED to save lives. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Pro Life

NARAL Sees Life as the Competition

By ACLJ.org1531145560658

Big Abortion is irate because Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers are using technology to steal their business and save babies. According to a recent report , the radical abortion group NARAL Pro-Choice America is livid with search engine Google for allowing pro-life advertisements, resulting in users being...

read more

ACLJ Files Support for Babies with Down Syndrome

By Michelle Terry1530547200000

On Friday, June 29, 2018, the American Center for Law & Justice filed an amicus curiae brief – a “friend of the court” brief – at the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Preterm-Cleveland, et al. v. Lance Himes, et al . We filed our brief on behalf of the ACLJ and our Committee to Defend...

read more

Pro-Life Centers Can’t Be Forced to Promote Abortion

By Geoffrey Surtees1530030093744

Today, in a 5-4 decision , the United States Supreme Court held that California cannot conscript pro-life pregnancy centers into mouthing a government-dictated message motivated by that state’s pro-abortion ideology. This is a resounding victory for the First Amendment right to free speech and the...

read more

Planned Parenthood Challenge to Arkansas Law Rejected

By Edward White1529071200000

Recently, the Supreme Court rejected a challenge brought by Planned Parenthood against an Arkansas law requiring abortion pill providers to contract with a physician who has hospital admitting privileges. Planned Parenthood had successfully convinced a trial court to grant an injunction against the...

read more