Three Things You Need to Know about the President’s Executive Order on Healthcare | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion


The President’s Executive Order on Healthcare

By ACLJ.org1507904666276

President Trump just signed an Executive Order “to Promote Healthcare Choice and Competition.” This Executive Order allows small businesses to unite to purchase healthcare across state lines and avoid portions of ObamaCare’s onerous mandates and failing healthcare markets. The President has exercised his constitutional authority to take the next step and do what Congress has failed to do for months: reform our broken healthcare system, lower costs, expand access to health insurance coverage, and restore our healthcare freedom.

The President’s Executive Order does three things. First, it directs the Department of Labor to treat small businesses like large companies under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). This allows these small businesses in the same industry to band together across state lines as “associations” and bargain for lower healthcare rates for their employees. It gives small businesses – the heart and soul of America’s economy – access to the same bargaining power as corporate America.

By allowing small businesses to unite as “associations” under ERISA, these new health plans avoid many of ObamaCare’s onerous regulations. For example, ObamaCare mandates every insurance policy contain certain coverage for certain maternity fees. Nuns, men, and elderly women are all forced to bear the cost for services they will never use. ERISA plans, however, do not have to abide by these onerous requirements. Now, you can choose to pay for the coverage you need.

Moreover, despite the alarmist claims of the Left, this reform will still protect the most vulnerable Americans. Any employer who chooses to participate in an “association” to offer its employees better healthcare coverage cannot exclude any of their employees from healthcare coverage based on preexisting conditions or charge them more because of their health. The Executive Order gives more Americans greater choice in their healthcare coverage without negatively impacting those who are already covered.

Second, the Executive Order directs the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Treasury to expand access to low cost short-term duration insurance (STLDI). These plans provide low cost coverage to those between jobs, who missed enrollment windows, or are in one of the many states with a failing ObamaCare insurance market.

Third, the Executive Order directs the Department of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Treasury to authorize the expanded use of Health Reimbursement Arrangements (or Health Reimbursement Accounts – HRAs). HRAs are employer-funded accounts that reimburse employees for healthcare expenses, including deductibles and copayments. Any money contributed to these counts is not counted as taxable income.

These three major reforms are designed to give Americans the freedom to purchase health insurance on their own terms, at affordable rates, and outside the failing and oppressive ObamaCare regime. Better yet, they cost nothing to the American taxpayer.

Moreover, these reforms are not only beneficial, but also, they are constitutional. Despite this fact, the Left and entrenched lobbyists will undoubtedly challenge this order.

At the ACLJ, we have consistently defended the President’s constitutional authority to enact positive change, whether it be immigration or healthcare. Unlike the last President who attempted to wield unconstitutional power, this President is squarely within his constitutional authority to undo the damage done be the previous Administration. As we have done before, we will defend this constitutional action. Together we can take this vital step toward lasting, fiscally responsible healthcare reform for the American people.

Take Action to Dismantle ObamaCare

ObamaCare  Signatures


Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

We’re working to dismantle ObamaCare one step at a time. But we can’t do it without you. Every gift (even $5) makes a big impact. Donate today.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in

Supreme Court Vindicates Little Sisters of the Poor

By Geoffrey Surtees1594242582045

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court has vindicated the foundational freedom of our country and the Constitution: the right of religious liberty. In a 7-2 decision , and after nearly a decade of litigation through all levels of the federal judiciary, the U.S. Supreme Court today— once and for all —upheld...

read more

Urging the Supreme Court to Strike Down Key Portions of ObamaCare

By Laura Hernandez1594221409354

Last week, the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court of the United States, urging the Court to affirm a Fifth Circuit decision holding the individual mandate unconstitutional. As you probably remember, the individual mandate required millions of...

read more

ACLJ Files at Supreme Court to Defeat Abortion-Pill Mandate

By Geoffrey Surtees1583790229750

Today, the ACLJ filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court in support of the Little Sisters of the Poor and the Trump Administration and their efforts to defend religious employers that object to the abortion-pill mandate. The brief was submitted on behalf of over 463,000 ACLJ...

read more

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear ObamaCare Case for 3rd Time

By Jordan Sekulow1583273806588

This could finally be the death knell for ObamaCare. The Supreme Court just agreed to hear a THIRD major challenge to ObamaCare, aka the Affordable Care Act, after a group of conservative-led states argued that the law is now, at least in part, unconstitutional. As reported by Fox News : The U.S.

read more