Simple Economics of the Latest ObamaCare Lie | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Simple Economics of the ObamaCare Lie

By Matthew Clark1383302895000

Despite how complicated President Obama wants to make it, his woefully misleading, dishonest, untruthful, broken promise (pick your poison) about how millions of Americans who have insurance can keep it is really quite simple.

President Obama knowingly and intentionally gave what he now calls “bad apple” insurance companies (you know disreputable companies like Blue Cross, Aetna, and Cigna) a choice between losing money and making money.

As is all too often the case in our free market economy, these insurance companies chose to stay in business.

It’s simple economics.

President Obama said if you like your health insurance you can keep it.  What he failed to say was that if your health insurance plan changed in the slightest – regardless of whether it was initiated by you or your insurance company – that plan would no longer be grandfathered in.  Insurance companies would legally no longer be able to offer it under ObamaCare.

Here’s how it works.

Health care costs (surprise, surprise) have gone up since 2010.  Insurance companies each year, almost without fail, change something about your insurance plan.  Now pretty much any change (I wrote about the regulations behind this here) made in the past three and a half years triggers the cancellation of the grandfather provision and thus the plan.

So insurance companies either keep the same exact plan that now costs it more because of increased health care costs, or it can dump that plan and offer a new more expensive plan that covers stuff you didn’t want and can’t afford and you are forced by law to take that plan (or a similar one some place else).

What do you think these insurance companies would choose?  Take the hit for the good name of the President or go ahead and take the increased cost.  If it was cheaper for the insurance company to keep the same plan over the past 3 years, they would have.

I may just be a caveman lawyer, but that’s simple economics.

This article is crossposted on Red State.

Latest in
ObamaCare

Ending the ObamaCare Individual Mandate

By Harry G. Hutchison1510850681175

Last year shortly after the election, the ACLJ issued its Agenda for the Future . We urged the incoming administration to immediately repeal and replace ObamaCare with a focus on the advancement of a patient-centered, consumer-driven program that emphasizes choice and competition . Today, we renew...

read more

The President’s Executive Order on Healthcare

By ACLJ.org1507904666276

President Trump just signed an Executive Order “to Promote Healthcare Choice and Competition.” This Executive Order allows small businesses to unite to purchase healthcare across state lines and avoid portions of ObamaCare’s onerous mandates and failing healthcare markets. The President has...

read more

A Victory Over the Abortion-Pill HHS Mandate

By Geoffrey Surtees1507322999866

Today, the Trump Administration took definitive action in defense of religious liberty. The Departments of Health of Human Services (HHS), Labor, and the Treasury issued “ interim final rules ” that, if finalized, will reverse the unconstitutional and illegal HHS Mandate created by the Obama...

read more

6 Keys to Repealing ObamaCare

By ACLJ.org1506028658479

The GOP has put forward their final attempt to repeal ObamaCare this year: The Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson bill, also known as Graham-Cassidy . Vice President Mike Pence has aptly described this as “ our last best chance to stop and turn [ObamaCare] around .” Time is of the essence because the...

read more