Secretary Sebelius Ignorant of the Constitution? | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Sebelius Ignorant of the Constitution?

By Geoffrey Surtees1335883694000

Last Thursday, Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, appeared at a full committee hearing of the House Education and Workforce Committee.

Representative Trey Gowdy of South Carolina asked Sebelius to explain her statement earlier this year that requiring religious employers to include abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization, and contraceptive services in their health insurance plans “strikes the appropriate balance between respecting religious freedom and increasing access to important preventive services.

The video exchange is a must see.

In response to Rep. Gowdy’s line of questioning, Sebelius displayed utter ignorance over the constitutional implications of her department’s anti-religious, anti-conscience mandate. She was wholly unfamiliar with the Supreme Court’s decisions regarding religious freedom; she relied on no legal memorandum in cobbling the mandate together; and, as Sebelius testified in February, she didn’t even seek the advice of the Department of Justice regarding the legality of the mandate.

Sebelius tried to extricate herself from the situation, saying, “I am not going to wade into constitutional law.”

Nice try, Ms. Sebelius.

When the HHS mandate was finalized earlier this year, the administration didn’t just “wade” into constitutional law, it jumped into it head first, without the slightest notion -- or apparently care -- of what the U.S. Constitution requires or what Supreme Court precedents say.

Secretary Sebelius has confirmed what many have known from day one. When it comes to pushing the ideology of Planned Parenthood, neither HHS nor the current administration will allow the right of religious freedom to stand in their way.

Ignorance may be bliss for Secretary Sebelius, but her ignorance comes at great cost to the constitutional rights of countless citizens.

The next time HHS contemplates another mandate to coerce others into violating their conscience, it should give thought to another mandate: the one set forth in the First Amendment.

Latest in
ObamaCare

Ending the ObamaCare Individual Mandate

By Harry G. Hutchison1510850681175

Last year shortly after the election, the ACLJ issued its Agenda for the Future . We urged the incoming administration to immediately repeal and replace ObamaCare with a focus on the advancement of a patient-centered, consumer-driven program that emphasizes choice and competition . Today, we renew...

read more

The President’s Executive Order on Healthcare

By ACLJ.org1507904666276

President Trump just signed an Executive Order “to Promote Healthcare Choice and Competition.” This Executive Order allows small businesses to unite to purchase healthcare across state lines and avoid portions of ObamaCare’s onerous mandates and failing healthcare markets. The President has...

read more

A Victory Over the Abortion-Pill HHS Mandate

By Geoffrey Surtees1507322999866

Today, the Trump Administration took definitive action in defense of religious liberty. The Departments of Health of Human Services (HHS), Labor, and the Treasury issued “ interim final rules ” that, if finalized, will reverse the unconstitutional and illegal HHS Mandate created by the Obama...

read more

6 Keys to Repealing ObamaCare

By ACLJ.org1506028658479

The GOP has put forward their final attempt to repeal ObamaCare this year: The Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson bill, also known as Graham-Cassidy . Vice President Mike Pence has aptly described this as “ our last best chance to stop and turn [ObamaCare] around .” Time is of the essence because the...

read more