Obama's Self-Induced Constitutional Clash | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

By Jay Sekulow1333656008000

A new development in the weeklong war of words launched by President Obama at the Supreme Court. Today, Attorney General Holder complied with a request by a federal appeals court judge to provide a written explanation about the role of the judiciary.

It all began on Monday when President Obama chastised the high court saying it would be "unprecedented" for the Supreme Court to overturn ObamaCare. He also attempted to raise doubts about the legitimacy of such opposition by what he called "activist" and "unelected" justices.

That prompted Judge Jerry Smith of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to express concern about the president's comments which many view as a challenge to judicial authority. As Judge Smith put it: "That has troubled a number of people who have read it as somehow a challenge to the federal courts or to their authority. And that's not a small matter." Judge Smith ordered the Department of Justice to do some homework and to provide a written explanation due today.

In a three-page letter, Attorney General Holder said "the power of the courts to review the constitutionality of legislation is beyond dispute," though it should only be exercised in "appropriate cases." He also claimed laws passed by Congress are "presumptively constitutional."

As I told Megyn Kelly on FOX News today, this whole episode was a self-induced error by the president and compounded by the Obama Administration. Even the president's former mentor, Harvard Law School professor Laurence Tribe, said the president "obviously misspoke."

Most Americans understand the role of the Supreme Court. And, President Obama's attempt to influence or intimidate the Justices while the ObamaCare case is pending before the high court is totally inappropriate.

The president certainly has the right to express his opinion about how he hopes the high court will rule on ObamaCare. But, his over-the-top warning crossed the line. As Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell put it today: The president should "back off" the Supreme Court and let the Court do its work.

Latest in
ObamaCare

Supreme Court Vindicates Little Sisters of the Poor

By Geoffrey Surtees1594242582045

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court has vindicated the foundational freedom of our country and the Constitution: the right of religious liberty. In a 7-2 decision , and after nearly a decade of litigation through all levels of the federal judiciary, the U.S. Supreme Court today— once and for all —upheld...

read more

Urging the Supreme Court to Strike Down Key Portions of ObamaCare

By Laura Hernandez1594221409354

Last week, the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court of the United States, urging the Court to affirm a Fifth Circuit decision holding the individual mandate unconstitutional. As you probably remember, the individual mandate required millions of...

read more

ACLJ Files at Supreme Court to Defeat Abortion-Pill Mandate

By Geoffrey Surtees1583790229750

Today, the ACLJ filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court in support of the Little Sisters of the Poor and the Trump Administration and their efforts to defend religious employers that object to the abortion-pill mandate. The brief was submitted on behalf of over 463,000 ACLJ...

read more

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear ObamaCare Case for 3rd Time

By Jordan Sekulow1583273806588

This could finally be the death knell for ObamaCare. The Supreme Court just agreed to hear a THIRD major challenge to ObamaCare, aka the Affordable Care Act, after a group of conservative-led states argued that the law is now, at least in part, unconstitutional. As reported by Fox News : The U.S.

read more