Search  |  Login  |  Register

Obama Chastising Supreme Court

By Edward White1333477958000

After I wrote yesterday’s post about the Left’s reaction to the ObamaCare oral arguments, President Obama publicly warned the Supreme Court not to overturn ObamaCare. The President said the Court would be taking an “unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.”

It is not surprising for this President to criticize the Supreme Court in public. You may recall his scolding of the Justices of the Supreme Court for one of their rulings while they were sitting in front of him during his 2010 State of the Union address.

What is surprising is his claim that it would be an unprecedented and extraordinary step for the Supreme Court to overturn an Act of Congress. One would imagine that the President, a graduate of the Harvard Law School and a former constitutional law professor, would know better. (He surely does and is just playing politics.)

The Court’s review and, in some cases, invalidation of federal laws is a longstanding tradition that is a key part of the Constitution’s system of separation of powers and checks and balances that helps to ensure that government entities do not exceed the limitations on their lawful authority.

Ten years ago, the Government Printing Office (“GPO”) published a document called “Acts of Congress Held Unconstitutional in Whole or in Part by the Supreme Court of the United States.” According to the GPO, from the time the Supreme Court was created through 2002, the Court overturned all or part of 158 Acts of Congress. Here is a partial list from 1990 to 2002:

  • 1990: Flag Protection Act of 1989.
  • 1991: Metropolitan Washington Airports Act of 1986.
  • 1995: The Gun Free School Zones Act of 1990.
  • 1997: Two provisions of the Communications Decency Act of 1996.
  • 1998: The Line Item Veto Act.
  • 2000: A provision of the Violence Against Women Act.
  • 2002: Two sections of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996.

When all is said and done, the Constitution’s text and history, not any outside pressure or criticism, should be the determining factor in how the Supreme Court resolves the ObamaCare case.

Latest in
ObamaCare

ACLJ Opposes New HHS Mandate Regs

By Geoffrey Surtees1413905016065

Today, the American Center for Law & Justice filed formal comments in objection to the administration’s latest efforts to see to it that both non-profit and for-profit groups continue to kowtow to the HHS Mandate. (The HHS Mandate, adopted pursuant to Obamacare, is that collection of rules and...

read more

Efforts Against Abortion Pill Mandate

By Edward White1412607468142

Litigation generally takes a long time before a case is finally resolved. Despite the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby decision this past summer, ruling that the HHS Mandate violates the religious exercise rights of for-profit businesses and their owners who oppose having to pay for abortion pill...

read more

Obama Repackages Abortion-Pill Mandate

By Matthew Clark1408738939000

The Obama Administration is not one to let a mere Supreme Court decision get in the way of its radical pro-abortion agenda. After losing major abortion-pill mandate litigation at the Supreme Court and then failing in an attempt to ram a new abortion-pill mandate through Congress (where it couldn’t...

read more

Another Win in HHS Mandate Litigation

By Edward White1407812800000

Over the past few years, the ACLJ has represented numerous businesses and their owners in seven lawsuits challenging the HHS Mandate, which requires businesses to include in their health plans coverage for contraception, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drugs in order to avoid crippling...

read more