The U.S. has processed an unbelievably low number of Christians as “refugee arrivals” from Iraq and Syria – the region being decimated by ISIS genocide.
According to the Refugee Processing Center’s report: From January 1, 2015 to date, the U.S. processed 11,086 Shiite, Suni and other Moslem (“Moslem”) versus 433 Christian refugee arrivals from Iraq. In the same time, the U.S. processed 5,345 Moslem versus 28 Christian refugee arrivals from Syria.
For 2015-2016, that’s a grand total of 16,431 Moslem versus 461 Christian refugee arrivals from Iraq and Syria.
In an attempt to justify this astounding discrepancy, the Obama Administration and congressional Democratic leadership continue to maintain that the U.S. should not consider a refugee’s religion in deciding whether to grant refugee status.
Most recently, Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.), House Democratic Whip and second-ranking member of the House Democratic Leadership, was confronted with the fact that “of the more than 1,000 refugees the U.S. admitted from Syria in May, only 2 were Christian and the rest were Muslims.” He was asked, “What specifically are you proposing to help Christians seeking to escape ISIL’s genocide?”
His response was dumbfounding: “Well, I don’t think the criteria ought to be on religion.” He went on to say that “we ought to apply fair criteria,” but reiterated: “Certainly not based upon religion.”
For at least two reasons, that’s absurd.
First, religion is one of the essential elements of refugee status under both U.S. and international law. Under U.S. law, a “refugee” is someone fleeing “because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group.”
The same is true under international law. According to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), a refugee is someone who “has a well-founded fear of persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group.” This definition comes from the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, as extended by the 1967 Protocol.
Thus, the notion that the U.S. should not take into account a particular refugee applicant’s religion from the refugee status determination is contrary to law.
Second, this position is absurd given what we know about ISIS – what it does and why it does it. Perhaps no one could make this point more plainly than Secretary of State John Kerry did in March 2016: “The fact is that Daesh [ISIS] kills Christians because they are Christians.”
Daesh [ISIS] is responsible for genocide against groups in areas under its control, including Yezidis, Christians, and Shia Muslims. Daesh is genocidal by self-proclamation, by ideology, and by actions – in what it says, what it believes, and what it does. Daesh is also responsible for crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing directed at these same groups and in some cases also against Sunni Muslims, Kurds, and other minorities.
So, we know that ISIS targets Christians in Iraq and Syria because they are Christians. Christians are being slaughtered, tortured, raped and displaced because they are Christian. We also know that under U.S. and international refugee law, religion is a criterion for granting refugee status.
Rep. Hoyer is wrong, and he should know better. He’s been in Congress long enough to know the law, and he voted in favor of the House Resolution declaring that ISIS genocide victims specifically include Christians and that Christians are among those targeted because of their religion.
But unfortunately, Rep. Hoyer’s view is not isolated. His words are not merely a misspeak. Recall that when asked about the discrepancy in December 2015, Assistant Secretary of State Anne Richard told the House Oversight Committee, “We’re not going to change the program, [to] somehow bring more of one particular religion than another.”
The Obama Administration and leaders in Congress must stop this nonsense. Christians are dying. This fundamentally flawed position conflicts with the law and intentionally ignores the reality – recognized by Secretary Kerry – that ISIS deliberately targets Christians.
While ignoring ISIS won’t make it go away, ignoring the Christians ISIS systematically targets for extinction, will, sadly, make them go away. That is specifically what ISIS says it will do. It’s happening right now.
We’ve told you about how we are implementing our 7-Point Plan to stop the ISIS genocide and protect the Christians, for example, by calling for the establishment of in-region safe zones for the victimized and displaced. We also called for safe zones in our policy proposal to Congress regarding the refugee crisis, which was approved by the House.
We’ve reported on our progress, and the tremendous amount of work left to be done. Stand with us we continue to demand meaningful action by our government and the international community. Sign our Petition to stop the genocide and our Petition to protect Americans and refugees from ISIS. Make your voice count today.
With your support, we're leading the charge on Capitol Hill to protect America, defeat ISIS, and defend Christians. Have your gift doubled. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.
Your data is secure. Learn More »
The ACLJ specifically called for a strategy session designed to counter the Islamic State, or ISIS almost one year ago. Consistent with this idea, the Trump Administration has invited more than 60 nations and international organizations to Washington next week. This comes as the Trump...
A federal district judge in Hawaii has just issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) blocking the key provisions of the President’s revised Executive order that pauses the refugee program and admittance of foreign nationals from 6 terrorist hotbeds (Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen)
As we reported about a week ago, President Trump issued a new, revised Executive Order addressing the very real terrorism threats hidden within our outdated and naive immigration and refugee programs. We previously filed an amicus brief at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals defending the...
In an astonishing display of misconduct, it appears that the Obama Administration may have placed politics ahead of the nation’s security right before the 2016 election. While the media is consumed with reports alleging Russia’s collusive interference in the November presidential election, and...