How a Recent Executive Order and FEC Statement Impact the Johnson Amendment’s Continued Impediment to the Church | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

The Johnson Amendment’s Continued Impediment to the Church

By Mark Goldfeder1600960199483

The Johnson Amendment is the controversial provision in the U.S. tax code that prohibits all 501(c)(3) non-profit organizations from participating or intervening in “any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.”

As it relates to churches and other houses of worship, essentially, the Amendment means that while faith leaders are free to discuss political issues, or to endorse candidates in their personal capacities, they cannot, in their official capacities, directly support or oppose any candidates for office. While enforcement has generally been lax since the passage of the Amendment, in theory a violation could result in the revocation of an organization’s tax-exempt status and the imposition of excise taxes.

Critics have long argued that the Johnson Amendment creates an unconstitutional infringement on the First Amendment rights of churches and pastors, while supporters on the Left claim that it merely separates partisan politics from overtaking and dividing the charitable sector. The ACLJ has long fought against this anti-free speech Amendment, urging its repeal.

Every election season brings with it some renewed interest in and questions about the applicability of the clause, and this year has been no different.  Recent comments from the Chair of the Federal Election Commission suggested that Church leaders could safely ignore the Amendment and feel free to endorse candidates for election, while some of his colleagues have pushed back on this notion.

The most recent disputes revolve around President Trump’s 2017 Executive Order on Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty. While the Johnson Amendment is still technically on the books, among other things, the President’s order directs the government “not to take adverse action against religious organizations that it would not take against other organizations in the enforcement of these restrictions.”

For an in-depth look at the history and policy behind the current Johnson Amendment debates, please see: Mark A. Goldfeder, Michelle K. Terry, To Repeal or Not Repeal: The Johnson Amendment, 48 U. Mem. L. Rev. 209, 211 (2017).

For more on the ACLJ’s fight against the unconstitutional Johnson Amendment, please see: How the Johnson Amendment Threatens Churches’ Freedoms.

Protect Pastors’ Free Speech

Free Speech  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly Tax-Deductible gift.

As we aggressively fight to protect pastors and defend religious liberty, we urgently need your support. Donate to defend free speech today.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from the ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Free Speech

Supreme Court Hears First Amendment Cases Involving Cancel Culture

By Laura Hernandez1620309540000

As everyone knows, “Cancel Culture” is a menacing fixture of American life now, and it jeopardizes the First Amendment right to privacy in one’s political and charitable associations. Recently, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Americans for Prosperity Foundation (APF) v. Bonta and Thomas...

read more

ACLJ Stands up for Student Speech Rights in Supreme Court Case

By Walter M. Weber1615301940000

The ACLJ has filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court defending the free speech rights of students while noting that the First Amendment does not give minors the right to broadcast foul language to other minors. The case, Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L . , involves a legal fight between...

read more

Brief Filed Urging Supreme Court To Protect Against “Cancel Culture”

By Laura Hernandez1614701049567

Hardly a day goes by that there isn’t another news story about someone suffering harassment or retaliation for their political views. Whether it’s a school firing a teacher for posting social media memes against the Democrat presidential candidate or a major newspaper proclaiming support for...

read more

CNN Calls to Eliminate Conservative News (Sekulow Recap)

By Jordan Sekulow1611008358465

CNN wants the elimination of conservative news. Today on Sekulow , we discussed CNN’s call to eliminate conservative news. There were horrifying comments in support of censoring conservatives being made and accepted over the weekend on Brian Stelter’s show on CNN. Here’s what former Facebook...

read more