Sen. Manchin, S. 1 by Any Other Name Is Still Unconstitutional | American Center for Law and Justice

Sen. Manchin, S. 1 by Any Other Name Is Still Unconstitutional

By Nathanael Bennett1624374319955

As we’ve discussed and written previously, the majorities in the U.S. House and U.S. Senate are currently attempting to federalize control of elections in the United States. This painfully unconstitutional effort comes in the form of the not-so-aptly-named “For the People Act” (H.R. 1 in the U.S. House and S.1 in the U.S. Senate).

H.R. 1/S. 1 is nearly 900 pages long and would rob states of the authority to control nearly every aspect of the election process. Everything from drawing congressional district lines to when and how voters are registered to whether and how voters can vote early or by mail would be under the control of the federal government if this legislation were to become law. Even voter ID laws would fall under the jurisdiction of the feds under the sweeping terms of H.R. 1/S. 1.

To add insult to injury, this legislation would also repeal the Lois Lerner Rule, which was enacted in 2018 to stop the IRS from targeting conservatives because of their political or religious views.

Our own Senior Counsel for Global Affairs (and former Secretary of State) Mike Pompeo has astutely labeled it a, “socialist wish list.”

All in all, H.R. 1/S. 1 is a dangerous bill that centralizes more power in Washington, D.C. It should be soundly rejected.

Fortunately, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) reached this same conclusion on June 6, 2021. The decision was anything but secret, as Sen. Manchin penned an Op-Ed announcing his decision, in which he said, “I believe that partisan voting legislation will destroy the already weakening binds of our democracy, and for that reason, I will vote against the For the People Act.”

It was not ambiguous or qualified. It was absolute. Sen. Manchin was opposed to S.1 on the merits. It was also not inconsequential, as his decision meant that a majority of the U.S. Senate (by a count of 51-49) opposed this federal takeover of elections.

It was, however, fleeting. Just 10 days later, Sen. Manchin publicly released a list of demands that must be included in order to win his support for the bill. Not only was this a direct contradiction of his stated opposition to the bill just 10 days earlier, but the core tenants from his list of demands were nearly identical to those in S. 1. In many ways, Sen. Manchin’s demands amounted to little more than moving the pillars of S. 1 into a “new” piece of legislation aimed at accomplishing the same goal—a federal takeover of elections.

Fast forward a few days, and the U.S. Senate is poised to take a vote on just that. Sen. Schumer has taken the 880-page text of S. 1, worked with Senate Rules Committee Chairman Amy Klobuchar to make some excruciatingly minor adjustments, and dropped the resulting 884-page text into a newly numbered bill, S. 2093. The Senate will vote today on whether or not to begin debate on that bill.

Make no mistake about it—S. 2093 is S. 1, and it still amounts to a federal takeover of elections. Sen. Manchin may have accomplished a change in the bill number, but nothing has changed to diminish the misguided nature of this bill. Sen. Manchin is aware of this dynamic, as he is now indicating he will vote to move forward on the bill if he thinks a “compromise” with Sen. Schumer is close at hand. It’s nothing short of astonishing—just 15 days after penning his opposition to the substance of S. 1, Sen. Manchin is now open to the idea of considering essentially the same bill under a different number. It is a transparent bait-and-switch, and the American people won’t fall for it.

Today, in order to preserve the decentralized nature of our elections—a characteristic that is critical in safeguarding the integrity of our elections—the U.S. Senate should reject S. 2093. Furthermore, it should continue to reject any bill that seeks to advance the substantive ideas of H.R. 1/S. 1.

Add your name to our petition defending the Constitution and the integrity of elections here.

Defend the Constitution and Election Integrity

Election Law  Signatures


Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

Make this a monthly Tax-Deductible gift.

As you vote, our legal team is preparing to defend the Constitution and the integrity of elections. Have your gift DOUBLED today. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from the ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Election Law

Protecting Election Integrity From the Biden Admin's Dishonesty

By Harry G. Hutchison1626699540000

After Texas Democrats fled from the Texas State legislature and abdicated their legal responsibilities to Texans, they boarded private planes well stocked with beer to fundraise money off their less-than-courageous escape. Then, despite their cowardice, the Texas Senate in a party-line vote passed...

read more

DOJ Is Suing Georgia Over Voting Law

By Jordan Sekulow1625000373656

The Department of Justice is suing the State of Georgia over a new voting law – SB 202. After several key races in Georgia had cast doubt for voters, Georgia lawmakers crafted an election bill that revised their former election laws to ensure fair and secure elections. The Left is claiming that...

read more

The Radical Left Rages After Massive Elections Power-Grab Fails

By Logan Sekulow1624481992626

Last night, the sweeping voting rights bill known as the “For the People Act (H.R. 1 in the House and S. 1 in the Senate) was blocked in the Senate . The Left is starting to realize the radical shift that they aimed to accomplish with gaining a different makeup of Congress – may not be as easy as...

read more

The Left Votes to Take Over Elections

By Jordan Sekulow1624396157612

Today, the Senate is going to vote on an immensely dangerous piece of proposed legislation that would jeopardize the integrity of our elections. We’ve told you what the “For the People Act” (H.R. 1 in the House and S. 1 in the Senate) entails and the consequences that would come with it. Even with...

read more

American Center for Law and Justice | Washington D.C. | Copyright © 2021, ACLJ | Privacy & Security Policy | Annual Report

The ACLJ is an organization dedicated to the defense of constitutional liberties secured by law.

Visit to submit a legal help request. All legal requests submitted via any other method cannot be answered.

Through our $1 Million Matching Challenge, all gifts will be doubled, dollar-for-dollar, up to the online daily total.

American Center for Law and Justice is a d/b/a for Christian Advocates Serving Evangelism, Inc., a tax-exempt, not-for-profit, religious corporation as defined under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, specifically dedicated to the ideal that religious freedom and freedom of speech are inalienable, God-given rights. The Center's purpose is to engage legal, legislative and cultural issues by implementing an effective strategy of advocacy, education and litigation to ensure that those rights are protected under the law. The organization has participated in numerous cases before the Supreme Court, Federal Court of Appeals, Federal District Courts, and various state courts regarding freedom of religion and freedom of speech. Your gift is very much appreciated and fully deductible as a charitable contribution. A copy of our latest financial report may be obtained by writing to us at P.O. Box 90555, Washington, DC 20090-0555.