California Violates Constitution to Protect Illegal Aliens | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion


California Violating the Constitution

By Edward White1522092407382

The State of California recently passed laws designed to shield illegal aliens residing in California from workplace enforcement actions conducted by federal immigration agents. To stop these new laws, the Trump Administration filed a federal lawsuit, and the American Center for Law and Justice (“ACLJ”) has submitted an amicus (friend-of-the-court) brief supporting the Administration’s efforts. The brief was submitted with the support of more than 65,000 people who have joined the ACLJ’s committee opposed to state actions that violate the United States Constitution.

In our brief, we focus on Assembly Bill 450. AB 450 imposes several prohibitions and requirements concerning workplace enforcement actions that are obstacles to the implementation of federal law. If an employer does not comply with AB 450, and instead complies with federal law, the California Attorney General has promised to prosecute the employer.

Under federal law, an employer may not employ an “unauthorized alien,” that is, an alien who is not lawfully admitted into this country for permanent residence or is not authorized to be employed. The employer must attest, under penalty of perjury, that he has verified that the employee is not an unauthorized alien. The employer must retain the verification form and supporting documentation and make them available for inspection by federal immigration agents.

Under federal law, immigration agents may enter nonpublic areas of a business, if the owner or another person with authority consents, to question employees about their immigration status and to inspect employment records. If the agent does not obtain consent, federal law allows a site inspection to take place based on a search warrant.Once properly admitted to the area, an agent may arrest an individual on the spot if he reasonably believes the individual is an illegal alien who is likely to escape.

AB 450 obstructs the enforcement of federal immigration laws in the following ways:

  • AB 450 prohibits employers from voluntarily consenting to allow an immigration enforcement agent to enter nonpublic areas of a place of labor. This provision is contrary to federal law, which allows the employer to consent. Thus, California is depriving employers of their right to consent and is requiring federal agents to obtain a judicial warrant to obtain access to those nonpublic areas even though access is allowed by consent under federal law.
  • AB 450 prohibits employers from voluntarily consenting to allow an immigration enforcement agent to access, review, or obtain certain employee records. Federal law allows for such access based on voluntary consent. As such, California is depriving employers of their right to consent and is placing unnecessary burdens on federal agents to obtain a subpoena or court order to gain access to employee records.
  • AB 450 requires employers to provide current employees with notice of any upcoming inspection of employee records by federal immigration enforcement agents. This notice provision ensures that employees who are illegally in this country will disappear and avoid detection before the inspection happens, jeopardizing federal law enforcement and, in some cases, public safety. (For instance, the Mayor of Oakland, California, last month warned illegal aliens in the Bay Area about upcoming raids by federal immigration agents. Hundreds of illegal aliens were thereby able to avoid arrest. Three of the illegal aliens who were targeted for those raids, but who avoided arrest, have since been apprehended on charges of robbery/gun crimes, drunk driving, and spousal abuse.)
  • AB 450 also prohibits employers from re-verifying the employment eligibility of a current employee. Under this provision, California is prohibiting employers from complying with their federally-imposed obligation to ensure they are not knowingly employing unauthorized aliens. In other words, California is preventing employers from reviewing employee records, which may be in error, and identifying those employees who are not allowed to be legally employed.

Because AB 450 is an obstacle to the enforcement of federal immigration law, it violates the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, which provides that federal law is the “supreme law of the land.” It imposes requirements and burdens on employers and federal immigration enforcement agents that unnecessarily hinder the implementation of federal law.

Just as the United States Constitution forecloses states from issuing their own currency or declaring war, it also forecloses states from attempting to usurp the federal government’s authority over immigration by hindering federal immigration law enforcement efforts. California has intentionally obstructed federal law enforcement efforts by shielding unauthorized aliens from lawful federal workplace immigration enforcement actions. California has also prohibited, rather than encouraged, cooperation with law enforcement, which is bad public policy.

We will keep you posted about this lawsuit and the efforts to stop California’s obstruction of federal immigration law.

Stop Rogue Leftist State Lawlessness

Constitution  Signatures


Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we aggressively fight to defeat the lawlessness in court, we urgently need your Tax-Deductible support. Donate today.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in

Radio Recap: AG Barr Testifies Before the Senate

By Jay Sekulow1556741722090

“A fairly anemic effort.” That’s what Attorney General called the counterintelligence investigation against the threat of Russian collusion in the 2016 Presidential campaign. On today’s show, we discussed Attorney General Bill Barr’s testimony before the U.S. Senate regarding his summary of the...

read more

Will SCOTUS Allow Citizenship Question on Census?

By Jay Sekulow1556137658938

Yesterday we told you how a question intended to be included on the upcoming 2020 census has been taken before the Supreme Court by critics who say it is offensive because it asks if everyone living in your home is “a citizen of the United States.” On today’s show, we asked whether the Supreme...

read more

JSL: BREAKING NEWS: Mueller Report Released

By Jordan Sekulow1555616480579

After a nearly two year investigation, involving 19 lawyers, 40 FBI agents, and a summary by Attorney General Bill Barr stating there was no collusion or obstruction, the Mueller report has been released. Today on the broadcast, we discussed the release of the Mueller report regarding Russian...

read more

JSL: Just Two Months Away from First Democrat Debate

By Jordan Sekulow1555443010634

It‘s actually shocking, but we are just over two months away from the first Democrat Presidential debate. The first Democrat Primary debates will be held over two nights on June 26-27 in Miami. On today’s broadcast, we discussed the Democrat candidates so far and provided analysis of who looks like...

read more