Reports of Death of Texas Abortion Law Greatly Exaggerated | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Reports of Death of TX Abortion Law Exaggerated

By Matthew Clark1383267978000

Today, a federal judge ruled that some portions of a Texas pro-life law are unconstitutional – but not the part you're thinking about.

Unsurprisingly, you may see headlines such as this one from the mainstream media: “Federal judge rules controversial Texas abortion law unconstitutional.”

This is just one more example of the abortion distortion playing itself out in the pro-abortion mainstream media.

You may remember a few months back that an angry pro-abortion mob, for a short time, thwarted the will of the people in passing a critical pro-life bill prohibiting abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy.

The legislature later passed this critical pro-life bill after Governor Perry called a special session to ensure that the will of the people of Texas protecting the lives of unborn babies was upheld.

This portion of the law, the main portion that garnered so much media attention and hate from the Left, was NOT struck down.  In fact, it wasn’t even a part of this particular lawsuit.

In this case, Planned Parenthood and others challenged two other provisions of the Texas abortion law: 1) a provision requiring that abortionists have admitting privileges at local hospitals to ensure that if a medical emergency arose, the abortionist could get the woman and baby to a hospital close by and 2) a provision requiring that when dangerous abortion drugs are administered to a woman that for the woman’s own health the FDA’s own guidelines be followed and the drugs not be administered without a doctor physically present in the room.

The federal district court struck the first requirement as unconstitutional while narrowing the second requirement.  The 20-week abortion ban remains untouched.

Here are the two key portions of the Judge’s ruling.  First, striking the doctor admittance requirement:

The admitting-privileges provision of House Bill 2 does not bear a rational relationship to the legitimate right of the state in preserving and promoting fetal life or a woman's health and, in any event, places a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus and is thus an undue burden to her.

Second, requiring a health and life of the mother exception for the abortion drug limitations – exceptions that if unclarified by a court or the legislature could swallow the rule:

The medication abortion provision may not be enforced against any physician who determines, in appropriate medical judgment, to perform the medication-abortion using off-label protocol for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.

Finally, and maybe most importantly, the court expedited the case, noting, “the final decision will be made by the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals or the U.S. Supreme Court.”

The sad irony of the court’s decision is that provisions of the law that were meant to protect women have now been limited under the auspices of the “health” of the mother.  Just another example of the abortion distortion we battle every day.

Update 10.31.2013:  The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has just granted an emergency stay allowing a critical portion of the pro-life Texas bill to go into effect.  The federal appeals court in a unanimous panel of what happened to be three female judges stated that the state law requiring abortionists to have admittance privileges at local hospitals does not “impose a substantial obstacle to abortions.”

This provision will go into effect as the case continues.  The portion of the lower court’s decision regarding the abortion drug restrictions remains in effect as the case continues. 

Planned Parenthood lamented that this ruling could force it to close up to one-third of its abortion clinics.

All said the vast majority of the pro-life law will go into effect.  This ruling is a major victory for the lives of unborn babies and women in Texas.

Latest in
Pro Life

CANCELED: Margaret Sanger – Founder of Planned Parenthood

By Olivia Summers1596636817979

It is well documented – and we’ve been telling you for years – that Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger, was a eugenicist who believed that society could, and should, create a superior race of people. Yet, Planned Parenthood has repeatedly overlooked its founder’s racist ideals and goals...

read more

States That Gave Planned Parenthood Millions Want Relief Money

By Jordan Sekulow1596207900343

Pro-abortion-led states are demanding COVID-19 relief money from the federal government, despite the fact that they’ve been funneling a fortune to Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry. At a time where they should also be fighting to protect the lives of their residents, certain states and...

read more

Conscience Rights Violated Even at Religiously Affiliated Hospitals?

By Jordan Sekulow1595854800000

Despite federal laws meant to protect them, pro-life doctors and nurses are still being pressured and coerced into assisting in procedures they have moral objections to – like abortions – for fear of losing their jobs. The ACLJ is working diligently to defend their constitutional rights of...

read more

ACLJ Urges Supreme Court To Follow Constitution

By Walter M. Weber1595536684696

The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) Friday filed a friend-of-the-court brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to put the Constitution itself ahead of its misguided pro-abortion precedents. As the ACLJ brief phrases it: [I]f fidelity to the Constitution is to be a hallmark of this Court as...

read more