“Pro-Choice” Radicals: Gosnell Infanticide Mere “Malpractice” | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

Gosnell Infanticide Mere Malpractice?

By Matthew Clark1365992955000

Over the weekend ACLJ Executive Director Jordan Sekulow and I wrote a column for the Washington Post on how the horrors of the Gosnell post-birth abortion trial is exposing the illogic of abortion.

In response, the overwhelming consensus of “pro-choice” readers (aside from the irony of claiming the Washington Post now has a pro-life bias) was that Gosnell’s trial is about “medical malpractice,” not abortion and murder.

Abortionist Kermit Gosnell is charged with capital murder for the horrific slaying of seven newborn infants in his abortion clinic.  That’s right; he is on trial for infanticide, yet the radical Left says this is merely a case of “malpractice.”

One radical leftist summed it up this way:  “The issue has nothing to do with abortion. It is malpractice as several comments have pointed out.”

That’s not pro-choice or even pro-abortion; that’s pro-infanticide.  To them the real travesty of the Gosnell case is that he botched the abortion such that the baby was born-alive.

This is the pro-abortion agenda.  Their mantra continues to be abortion, on demand, even after birth, and without apology.  It’s sick.

The horrors of the Gosnell trial and the “pro-choice” extremists’ response is exposing abortion for what it is.  As we explained in our column:

In what can only be described as a “house of horrors,” abortion provider Kermit Gosnell stands trial in Philadelphia, charged with the grotesque murder of at least seven infants, allegedly born alive after botched abortions only to be brutally killed moments later.

As this nearly month-long trial continues, it paints the stark and unmistakably abhorrent reality of abortion. While the national mainstream media has been all but silent about this trial, the headlines coming from local media coverage have been morbidly graphic. Babies born alive and then allegedly killed in truly barbaric ways.

The details emerging from this trial are too graphic for us to even put into words, yet our society allows this same unspeakable torture of another human being to occur just so long as the baby is still inside the womb.

The Gosnell trial in conjunction with a Planned Parenthood lobbyist’s recent admission that the abortion giant has no issue with this life-ending practice is lifting the veil of secrecy from an industry long shrouded from public scrutiny.

Continue reading and share this article that has pro-abortion radicals so riled up.

Latest in
Pro Life

ACLJ Fighting Big Abortion

By ACLJ.org1461870737880

The American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) represents Troy Newman, a former board member of the Center for Medical Progress (CMP), in two critical First Amendment cases involving a journalistic investigation of the abortion industry that uncovered extensive evidence of a willingness to engage in,

read more

Congressional Investigation on Abortion

By Palmer Williams1461355557011

New evidence was disclosed this week that further proves abortion clinics have profited from the sale of aborted baby body parts. Despite the abortion lobby’s attempts to drown out the facts with distracting and deceptive tactics , the House Select Investigative Panel on Infant Lives uncovered hard...

read more

UN: Pro-Life Laws are “Torture”

By Benjamin P. Sisney1461086282414

“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” The definition of “torture” has a new meaning. According to a recent United Nations (UN) report , pro-life laws now constitute “torture.” That’s right. Pro-life laws...

read more

Planned Parenthood's Deadly Message

By Joseph Williams1460580987619

Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky joined with the ACLU to sue the state of Indiana over a recent law passed to prohibit abortions based only on the unborn child’s sex, race, color, national origin, ancestry, or disability, including Down Syndrome. Claiming that the bill places an undue...

read more