Simple Economics of the Latest ObamaCare Lie | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Simple Economics of the ObamaCare Lie

By Matthew Clark1383302895000

Despite how complicated President Obama wants to make it, his woefully misleading, dishonest, untruthful, broken promise (pick your poison) about how millions of Americans who have insurance can keep it is really quite simple.

President Obama knowingly and intentionally gave what he now calls “bad apple” insurance companies (you know disreputable companies like Blue Cross, Aetna, and Cigna) a choice between losing money and making money.

As is all too often the case in our free market economy, these insurance companies chose to stay in business.

It’s simple economics.

President Obama said if you like your health insurance you can keep it.  What he failed to say was that if your health insurance plan changed in the slightest – regardless of whether it was initiated by you or your insurance company – that plan would no longer be grandfathered in.  Insurance companies would legally no longer be able to offer it under ObamaCare.

Here’s how it works.

Health care costs (surprise, surprise) have gone up since 2010.  Insurance companies each year, almost without fail, change something about your insurance plan.  Now pretty much any change (I wrote about the regulations behind this here) made in the past three and a half years triggers the cancellation of the grandfather provision and thus the plan.

So insurance companies either keep the same exact plan that now costs it more because of increased health care costs, or it can dump that plan and offer a new more expensive plan that covers stuff you didn’t want and can’t afford and you are forced by law to take that plan (or a similar one some place else).

What do you think these insurance companies would choose?  Take the hit for the good name of the President or go ahead and take the increased cost.  If it was cheaper for the insurance company to keep the same plan over the past 3 years, they would have.

I may just be a caveman lawyer, but that’s simple economics.

This article is crossposted on Red State.

Latest in
ObamaCare

Seven Steps to Dismantle Obamacare

By Harry G. Hutchison1479228324786

The Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) was enacted with great fanfare and unrivaled deception in 2010 as part of a duplicitous plan to destroy America’s private health care system as we know it. The Speaker of the House at the time, Nancy Pelosi, infamously said in March 2010 that, “we have to pass...

read more

The Obamacare Deception Threatens America

By Harry G. Hutchison1477500715632

Promising to bring costs down and increase access on the one hand, and enacted with enormous fanfare and unequaled deception on the other, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare) became law in 2010. This law was perhaps the most ambitious social legislation in...

read more

“Pure Applesauce”

By Matthew Clark1456416575920

One of Justice Scalia’s most memorable moments came in a compelling dissent to one of the recent ObamaCare cases. He cut through the majority opinion’s ambiguous, contorted, and complex legal justification for upholding the “SCOTUScare” exchanges in just two words: “ Pure applesauce. ” Pondering...

read more

HHS Mandate Challenges Move Forward

By Geoffrey Surtees1442515755574

Thanks to two decisions of a federal court of appeals handed down today ( here and here ), it is now almost certain that the U.S. Supreme Court will decide next term whether the Obama administration can force religious entities, institutions, and groups -- under pain of severe financial penalties...

read more