Search  |  Login  |  Register

Sebelius Ignorant of the Constitution?

By Geoffrey Surtees1335883694000

Last Thursday, Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, appeared at a full committee hearing of the House Education and Workforce Committee.

Representative Trey Gowdy of South Carolina asked Sebelius to explain her statement earlier this year that requiring religious employers to include abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization, and contraceptive services in their health insurance plans “strikes the appropriate balance between respecting religious freedom and increasing access to important preventive services.

The video exchange is a must see.

In response to Rep. Gowdy’s line of questioning, Sebelius displayed utter ignorance over the constitutional implications of her department’s anti-religious, anti-conscience mandate. She was wholly unfamiliar with the Supreme Court’s decisions regarding religious freedom; she relied on no legal memorandum in cobbling the mandate together; and, as Sebelius testified in February, she didn’t even seek the advice of the Department of Justice regarding the legality of the mandate.

Sebelius tried to extricate herself from the situation, saying, “I am not going to wade into constitutional law.”

Nice try, Ms. Sebelius.

When the HHS mandate was finalized earlier this year, the administration didn’t just “wade” into constitutional law, it jumped into it head first, without the slightest notion -- or apparently care -- of what the U.S. Constitution requires or what Supreme Court precedents say.

Secretary Sebelius has confirmed what many have known from day one. When it comes to pushing the ideology of Planned Parenthood, neither HHS nor the current administration will allow the right of religious freedom to stand in their way.

Ignorance may be bliss for Secretary Sebelius, but her ignorance comes at great cost to the constitutional rights of countless citizens.

The next time HHS contemplates another mandate to coerce others into violating their conscience, it should give thought to another mandate: the one set forth in the First Amendment.

Latest in
ObamaCare

Efforts Against Abortion Pill Mandate

By Edward White1412607468142

Litigation generally takes a long time before a case is finally resolved. Despite the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby decision this past summer, ruling that the HHS Mandate violates the religious exercise rights of for-profit businesses and their owners who oppose having to pay for abortion pill...

read more

Obama Repackages Abortion-Pill Mandate

By Matthew Clark1408738939000

The Obama Administration is not one to let a mere Supreme Court decision get in the way of its radical pro-abortion agenda. After losing major abortion-pill mandate litigation at the Supreme Court and then failing in an attempt to ram a new abortion-pill mandate through Congress (where it couldn’t...

read more

Another Win in HHS Mandate Litigation

By Edward White1407812800000

Over the past few years, the ACLJ has represented numerous businesses and their owners in seven lawsuits challenging the HHS Mandate, which requires businesses to include in their health plans coverage for contraception, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drugs in order to avoid crippling...

read more

Massive Blow to ObamaCare

By David French1406047849000

It looks like Nancy Pelosi should have read ObamaCare before she passed it. This morning, in a 2-1 decision the D.C. Circuit struck down a lawless IRS rule that dramatically extended ObamaCare subsidies well beyond the law’s written guidelines. Put simply, the D.C. Circuit found that ObamaCare...

read more