Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Jay Sekulow1317138146000

There's been another step forward in having the United States Supreme Court hear the constitutional challenges to ObamaCare.

As I told you last week, our legal team completed oral arguments in our federal lawsuit urging a federal appeals court in Washington to reinstate our lawsuit and declare the individual mandate, which forces Americans to purchase health insurance, unconstitutional. During the hearing, serious questions were raised about whether Congress overstepped its authority with Judge Brett Kavanaugh putting it this way: "In 220 years there has been a whole lot of laws and a lot of crises, yet Congress has never once mandated a purchase."

As we await a decision in our case, there's another case challenging ObamaCare that's moving down the track headed for the Supreme Court.

The Obama Administration has decided not to appeal a decision by a three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit which determined the individual mandate was unconstitutional. This is a case out of Florida where we filed a critical amicus brief representing 74 members of Congress and more than 70,000 Americans. Instead of asking the full appeals court to rehear the case, the Obama Administration has decided to take the appeal directly to the Supreme Court.

In my mind, there's never really been a question about whether the Supreme Court will hear ObamaCare, it's been more of a question of timing. There is a split between the appeals courts. The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the mandate, the 11th Circuit has ruled it unconstitutional, and the 4th Circuit has ruled that a tax law prevents it from issuing a decision on the mandate until at least 2014.

A couple of questions still remain: which case or cases will the high court actually take? And, will they tackle this issue before the November 2012 elections? Important questions that are likely to be answered soon.

We will keep you posted.

Latest in
ObamaCare

ACLJ Opposes New HHS Mandate Regs

By Geoffrey Surtees1413905016065

Today, the American Center for Law & Justice filed formal comments in objection to the administration’s latest efforts to see to it that both non-profit and for-profit groups continue to kowtow to the HHS Mandate. (The HHS Mandate, adopted pursuant to Obamacare, is that collection of rules and...

read more

Efforts Against Abortion Pill Mandate

By Edward White1412607468142

Litigation generally takes a long time before a case is finally resolved. Despite the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby decision this past summer, ruling that the HHS Mandate violates the religious exercise rights of for-profit businesses and their owners who oppose having to pay for abortion pill...

read more

Obama Repackages Abortion-Pill Mandate

By Matthew Clark1408738939000

The Obama Administration is not one to let a mere Supreme Court decision get in the way of its radical pro-abortion agenda. After losing major abortion-pill mandate litigation at the Supreme Court and then failing in an attempt to ram a new abortion-pill mandate through Congress (where it couldn’t...

read more

Another Win in HHS Mandate Litigation

By Edward White1407812800000

Over the past few years, the ACLJ has represented numerous businesses and their owners in seven lawsuits challenging the HHS Mandate, which requires businesses to include in their health plans coverage for contraception, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drugs in order to avoid crippling...

read more