The opposition to the mandate and compromise put in place by the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) continues to grow as pressure continues to be applied to HHS Secretary Sebelius.
We have sent a detailed legal analysis to Secretary Sebelius on behalf of nearly 70,000 Americans - urging the Secretary to reverse the troubling regulations put in place - measures that violate religious liberty and the conscience rights of millions of Americans.
We've been reporting in detail on the problems with the HHS regulations. The mandate requires religious institutions, such as religious schools and hospitals, to include abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization, and contraception in their insurance policies for employees. A so-called "accommodation" was then issued after a tremendous public outcry occurred opposing the mandate.
The fact is that these regulations are not about health care. They represent a dangerous power play by the federal government. It's the ultimate in government intrusion, representing a significant threat to religious organizations.
Our legal analysis is clear: this is not only bad policy, it is unconstitutional as well.
The analysis, which is posted here, explains in detail why the mandate violates the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause as well as the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). The letter also notes that the "accommodation" is "a smoke and mirrors game" that does nothing to remove the burden on religious exercise imposed by the contraception mandate.
We urge Secretary Sebelius to take immediate corrective action:
"Whether mandating that religious employers or individuals violate their conscience by directly paying for contraceptives, or by contributing to a health insurance plan that is mandated to provide contraceptives, the comprehensive guidelines violate the First Amendment, and RFRA. The HHS should revise the comprehensive guidelines and remove the requirement that all insurance companies make contraceptives an obligatory part of every insurance package."
We're delighted that nearly 70,000 Americans signed on to our petition demanding the HHS reverse these disturbing regulations.
We've already told you about the growing number of Americans who oppose the mandate and compromise. And, of course, the Catholic Church, which has been extremely vocal in its opposition, isn't backing down. All 180 Roman Catholic Bishops have now publicly denounced the HHS regulations. There are now reports that Obama Administration officials will begin meeting "in the coming days" with religious organizations and insurers to try to hammer out policies "that respect religious liberty. . . ."
There's a simple way to do that, if the Obama Administration is serious. As we have said from the very start, eliminate the mandate and all language that requires people of faith to violate their deeply help religious beliefs.
The opposition isn't going away. The public outcry isn't going to stop. Mr. President and Secretary Sebelius, are you listening?
As we approach the one year anniversary of the Hobby Lobby decision , where the Supreme Court held that the HHS Mandate violated the religious liberties of business owners, it’s clear that the struggle to vindicate religious freedom and the right to conscience is far from over. Having said that,
Today the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that could cripple ObamaCare. The Supreme Court has a critical opportunity to reject IRS regulations that illegally authorize tax subsidies for purchasers of health insurance on federal healthcare exchanges. The ACLJ has filed an amicus...
After his “glib” apology before Congress this week for calling the American people “stupid,” ObamaCare architect Jonathan Gruber attempted to dodge, duck, dip, dive, and … dodge every substantive question that came his way. He refused to answer even the simplest questions like how much ( millions )
From day one, we have warned that the real danger of Obamacare is not in the 2,700 pages of its text (as bad as they are), but in the hundreds of thousands of pages of rules and regulations that would flow out of that text. This week provides yet another example of that danger, and it is in the...