Search  |  Login  |  Register

“Criminal Investigations” aren't Phony

By Matthew Clark1375999583000

As the IRS continues its attempts to delay the truth and the Obama Administration continues to spin the IRS targeting as a “phony scandal,” the FBI is engaged in what President Obama’s own Justice Department has classified as “criminal investigations” in recent court filings.

Last week the Department of Justice filed a motion for extension with the U.S. federal district court in Washington, D.C., in the ACLJ’s lawsuit on behalf of 41 targeted groups.  The ACLJ represents Tea Party groups, pro-life groups, and other conservative groups caught up in the IRS targeting dragnet.

The government filed a motion for a 60-day extension to file its first response.  The government had been required to respond to the ACLJ’s lawsuit by August 8th and has requested an extension to October 7, 2013.  The government’s motion also indicated that it “may need to seek an additional extension of time at the expiration of 60 days.”

In addition to the need for more time, the DOJ’s motion includes several important revelations.  First, President Obama’s DOJ acknowledges that the FBI is engaged in ongoing “criminal investigations” of the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups.

While President Obama and his defenders on the left keep calling the IRS targeting of conservatives a “phony scandal,” his own Justice Department asserts that there are ongoing “criminal investigations.”  This is clearly not a “phony” scandal.  This is a real scandal with serious implications.

The government’s motion and accompanying affidavits also note that the IRS is compiling documents and other data from “115 custodians.”  The IRS has assembled a “19-member technology and support team” and the data is being reviewed by “80 employees of the Office of Chief Counsel.”

Yet, with this mass of resources supposedly engaged on this case, leaders from both sides of the aisle in both the House and Senate are accusing the IRS of stonewalling on information requests.  Senator Max Baucus (D), Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee which is charged with oversight of the IRS, recently sent a stinging bipartisan letter to the IRS.  Senator Baucus, hardly a Tea Party sympathizer, has accused the IRS of withholding “the bulk of the relevant information including key emails and documents belonging to the relevant decision makers both in the IRS and elsewhere in government.”  He was joined by the ranking member of that committee, Senator Orrin Hatch (R).  Likewise the Chairmen of the House committees on Oversight and Ways and Means have sent similar letters asserting that the IRS is engaging in a pattern of delay and obfuscation in turning over relevant documents.

ACLJ’s lawsuit will continue even in the face of these IRS delays.  The truth will eventually come out.

This article is crossposted at RedState.com.

Latest in
Free Speech

County to Interrogate Teens Over Faith

By Matthew Clark1421264952394

A school board in Virginia is considering the repeal of a policy that would have forced 14-year-old minors to stand before the school board to be interrogated about their religious beliefs. The Goochland County policy is aimed at homeschool families that fall under Virginia’s decades-old religious...

read more

House Report Confirms IRS “Bias”

By Jay Sekulow1419356716682

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee has released a scathing interim report detailing extreme political “bias” throughout the ranks of the IRS that led to it targeting conservative groups in response to the anti-conservative group rhetoric “being openly and loudly espoused by the...

read more

IRS (Finally) Approves 2 More Groups

By ACLJ.org1419273797845

After years of needless delays, the IRS has finally approved two more targeted conservative groups. Late last week the IRS relented and informed us that it has agreed to approve the tax-exempt status of the North East Tarrant Tea Party and Myrtle Beach Tea Party, as 501(c)(4) organizations. North...

read more

Academic Freedom Under Fire at KU

By David French1418157957737

When it comes to threatening core liberty interests, activists can be nothing if not industrious — sometimes using even well-intentioned laws as sledgehammers against disfavored views and disfavored speakers. Witness the emerging use of state open-records laws to harass dissenting professors. The...

read more