Playing the Filibuster Card | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Nathanael Bennett1306200538000

As the showdown approaches in the U.S. Senate over the use of the judicial filibuster, everyone on both sides is counting votes.  Will there be enough support to change the rules and put the filibuster off limits?

An interesting development occured today when one of President Bush's judicial nominees went before the Senate Judiciary Committee.  Utah attorney Thomas Griffith was nominated for a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.  Today he cleared the Judiciary Committee by a vote of 14-4.  That means four Democrats voted in support of Griffith, who was nominated to replace Miguel Estrada - an attorney who withdrew his nomination after being filibustered.  The Democrats now say there is not likely to be a filibuster of Griffith because he garnered some Democratic support on the Judiciary Committee.  Can the same be said of the nine nominees - all well-qualified - who were filibustered last time?  They will go before the Judiciary Committee again - and there is nothing to suggest that they will get any Democratic support.  But what's worse - it is very likely that this small minority will prevent their colleagues from voting on these nominees by utilizing the judicial filibuster.  In other words, the obstructionist tactic that put their nomination on the shelf last session is likely to be utilized again with the same result.

The fact is that all of these nominees would have been confirmed without delay by a simply majority vote - if their nomination went to the full Senate floor.  That did not happen because of the filibuster.  And, it is likely that a small minority in the Senate won't permit them to get an up-or-down vote this time either knowing that they will be confirmed by the full Senate.

That's why the rules change has to take place.  The ACLJ is working on Capitol Hill to get rid of this judicial filibuster and let the nominees get what they deserve - full consideration on the Senate floor.

More than 20,000 people already have signed on to our Petition to End Judicial Filibusters.  If you name is not on the list, it needs to be.  Add your name today!

Latest in
ACLJ

Jay Sekulow Live: #3 Podcast on iTunes

By Jay Sekulow1452029152358

This morning you made something really unique happen. My son Logan had an old friend reach out to him to let him know that, while downloading the latest episode of a popular podcast, he discovered that the Jay Sekulow Live! podcast of our daily radio program is ranked number 3 on iTunes. To our...

read more

Building Upon 2015’s Victories

By Jay Sekulow1451419200000

Thanks to the engagement of ACLJ members supporting our work, signing our petitions, and sharing our important advocacy with friends, we achieved numerous significant victories around the world in 2015. For the past several weeks we’ve been outlining this year’s success in our 2015 Victories Series...

read more

A Season of Thanks

By Jay Sekulow1448463600000

On October 3, 1789, President George Washington issued the first-ever Thanksgiving Proclamation , declaring November 26, 1789 a day of Thanksgiving. While reading the entire declaration (posted below), I couldn’t help but dwell on what I’m thankful for this year. I’m thankful for a growing family...

read more

“Undemocratic” Debuts on NYT

By ACLJ.org1433262160821

ACLJ Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow’s latest book, “Undemocratic: How Unelected, Unaccountable Bureaucrats are Stealing Your Liberty and Freedom,” has debuted on The New York Times E-Book Nonfiction Best Sellers List at Number 10. Because of your continued help and support, “Undemocratic” joins “Rise of...

read more