ACLJ Continues to Seek Answers Surrounding the Decision by the Army (and the Marines) to Ban Bible Verses on Military Dog Tags That Include Service Logos
ACLJ Seeks Answers on Army Rule Aimed at Christian Troops
We recently told you about the reported United States Marine Corps (“USMC”) decision to pull the license of Shields of Strength (“SoS”) in response to one organization’s erroneous complaint. The anti-Christian organization demanded that the USMC “immediately revoke and cancel the current approval for ‘Shields of Strength’ to continue using the official USMC emblem on any and/or all of its religious items for sale.”
In response to this ridiculous complaint and the USMC’s decision to comply, we submitted a FOIA request to the USMC to get answers. As we pointed out in our initial update, SoS is an organization worth fighting for as it supports our troops in a powerful way.
Not surprisingly, the same anti-Christian organization sent a similar threatening complaint to the Army Trademark Licensing Program Director. Once again, the organization demanded that the Army immediately “cease and desist from [allowing use of] the official Army logo on [SoS] Christian religious proselytizing sales products. . . .”
And similar to the USMC’s response, the Army, according to reports, caved to the organization. In fact, according to reports, on August 12, 2019, the Army Trademark Licensing Program Director sent the following email to Mr. Vaughan, founder of SoS: “You are not authorized to put biblical verses on your Army products. For example Joshua 1:9. Please remove ALL biblical references from all of your Army products.”
As we explained in our recent post, if the Army (or USMC) approved the sale of SoS religious products that include the official Army emblem and also approved the sale of SoS non-religious products that include the Army emblem, then there is not a First Amendment problem. In fact, in this context, if the Army were to prohibit the sale of SoS religious products that include the Army emblem, while permitting the sale of non-religious products with the Army emblem, the Army would be in violation of the First Amendment by denigrating religious expression in favor of non-religious expression.
As such, we’ve just sent Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to get answers from both the Army and the USMC. And we will continue to provide updates as more information becomes available.
As we aggressively take legal action to defend the Bible and religious liberty in the military, we need your support. Donate today.
Air Force Court Under Attack for Hearing at Liberty University
It is not uncommon that federal and state courts of all descriptions periodically hold actual proceedings at law schools throughout the United States. One such instance recently took place at Liberty University, where the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, a component of the military justice...
ACLJ Supports Bible Verses on Military Dog Tags
This country is blessed to have numerous businesses that proudly support the United States military and its service members. Shields of Strength (“SoS”) is one such business. It is worth briefly sharing about SoS . It was December 1998 that the first Shields of Strength were placed in a store. They...
Anti-Christian Antagonists Move to Ban Dog Tag Bible Verses
Once again, the ACLJ is taking action to defend the faith of countless soldiers as an extreme, anti-Christian organization that constantly attacks faith in our military wants to bar them from displaying their faith on their dog tags alongside their respective Service insignias. Countless men and...
A Constitutional Crisis Over . . . Candy Canes? Apparently So!
Just when you thought that the anti-Christian crowd could not become more unhinged, they become more unhinged. What’s the issue this time? The sale of candy canes (which they refer to derisively as “Jesus Candy”) at military post and base exchanges. To the unhinged, the mere presence in military...