Should Religious Leaders Be Able to Endorse Political Candidates? | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

By Jay Sekulow1308675981000

The IRS is stifling the free speech rights of religious leaders in a world where most Americans understand that the intersection of faith and politics is a well-recognized part of this nations culture and heritage.

The problem: a 54-year-old federal tax law that prevents religious leaders from truly exercising their constitutionally-protected free speech rights when they act in their official capacity as a pastor or head of a religious, tax-exempt organization.  

The IRS regulation is clear:  tax-exempt organizations may not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.  A violation can result in the revocation of the organizations tax-exempt status.

In 1954, then-Senator Lyndon Johnson introduced an amendment that became law that barred tax-exempt groups including churches from participating in political activity.  Johnson sought political retribution against an opponent who was assisted in his campaign by two non-profit organizations.

Religious leaders are muzzled by the IRS law.  While they can speak out for themselves in their individual capacity, they are barred from either supporting or opposing a political candidate in their role as head of a tax-exempt organization. 

On one hand, the IRS says its permissible for religious leaders to discuss important issues of public policy (as they should), but are prohibited from supporting or opposing a candidate who takes positions on those issues.  Thats absurd.  The prohibition makes no sense and has far-reaching implications.  It censors pastors in the pulpit.  And it turns the IRS, which was originally designed to collect revenue for the general treasury, into the speech police.

Religious leaders not only have a constitutional right to address the moral issues of the day many believe they have a responsibility to do so.  And, pastors should have the ability to speak out from the pulpit and support or oppose a political candidate based on where the candidate stands on the issues. 

Its important to remember that this nation has a rich and welcomed history of turning to religious leaders and churches during the debate of the great moral issues of the day.  The election sermon was once very common pastors acknowledging our religious heritage and addressing key issues of their day.  During the revolutionary era, pastors in the pulpit encouraged dissent and called for freedom the prelude to the birth of our country a country that cherishes free speech.  That freedom is as important today as it was then.  Unfortunately, pastors now risk losing their tax-exempt status if they speak out.

The IRSs enforcing regulations are confusing and bad law and hold that even what it calls coded words like pro-life and pro-choice can violate the law and result in loss of tax-exemption.  It creates fear and intimidation.  Its often unevenly applied.  And its simply unfair.

Consider this:  The IRS restrictions apply to religious non-profit organizations, but they do not apply to other non-profit groups - including labor unions - whose leadership is free to endorse or oppose any political candidate in their official capacity.  The rationale for the difference is that religious organizations are subsidized because the contributions they receive are tax-deductible by the donor.  But by that explanation labor unions are just as subsidized because union dues are deductible as an employee expense.

The time has come to give religious leaders unbridled free speech. Congress is considering legislation to repeal the 54-year-old law targeting churches and tax-exempt organizations. 

Such a move wont result in churches or religious organizations being turned into political machines.  It will make it easier, though, for religious leaders to speak out clearly about the issues and candidates that shape the lives and affect the future of millions of people of faith.


Jay Sekulow is Chief Counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), a Washington, DC-based law firm focusing on constitutional law.


Latest in
Constitution

U.S. Senate Confirms 200th Federal Judge Under Trump Presidency

By David Fonseca1593694800000

At the ACLJ, we have been periodically updating you on the work the U.S. Senate has been doing to confirm judges at quite a rapid pace . Last week, upon confirming Judge Cory Wilson to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit by a tight vote of 52-48, the Senate reached a judicial milestone...

read more

Radio Recap – BREAKING: Flynn Judge ORDERED to Drop Case

By Jordan Sekulow1593034383366

The Flynn judge in the district court has been ordered to drop the case. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live , we discussed the breaking news that the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has ordered the Flynn judge to drop the case. This is a full vindication of Lt. General Michael Flynn. The General Flynn case...

read more

JSL – What Comes Next in the Michael Flynn Saga

By Jordan Sekulow1592254669193

The ACLJ’s team provided legal analysis on the state of General Flynn’s case. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live, our team provided exclusive analysis of Friday’s oral arguments in the General Flynn case. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments from General Flynn’s attorney, a DOJ official...

read more

Radio Recap – In a Bizarre Move, Flynn Judge Lawyers Up

By Jordan Sekulow1590528315633

In a bizarre move , the judge in the General Flynn case has lawyered up. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live we discussed the latest bizarre move made by the judge in the Flynn case. Judge Sullivan has hired an attorney to represent him in responding to the D.C. Court of Appeals demand that he respond to...

read more