Senate, Don’t Confirm Appointees Unless Obama Retracts Unconstitutional Appointments | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

By Matthew Clark1328144052000

The ACLJ is calling for the Senate to take strong action in response to the “dangerous precedent” set by President Obama’s non-recess appointments. In a letter sent to Members of the U.S. Senate today, Jay Sekulow, ACLJ Chief Counsel, urged:

On behalf of our organization and the more than 84,000 Americans who have signed our Petition to Retract Unconstitutional Appointments, we urge the Senate to take decisive action in opposition to President Obama’s unconstitutional non-recess appointments. We urge you to use your power under the Senate rules to prevent the confirmation of any Executive Branch nominees unless and until President Obama secures the resignation of each of his unconstitutional appointees.

In addition to explaining why the appointments, made while the Senate was still in session, are unconstitutional, the letter warns, “If the President has the power to determine when the Senate is and is not in session, he would have nearly limitless power to appoint whomever he wishes without the constitutionally mandated advice and consent of the Senate.” The Senate must take action to “restore the separation of powers and the constitutionally mandated advice and consent of the Senate in the presidential appointment process.”

This week Congress has already held two hearings related to these non-recess appointments.

Today, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee held a hearing to discuss options available to respond to President Obama’s “recess” appointments. The Wall Street Journal reports, “Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R., Calif.) lambasted Mr. Obama’s appointments as a ‘political power play’ . . . .” Republican lawyer C. Boyden Gray, who himself was a recess appointee under the Bush Administration, testified that while the House may not have standing to file suit itself, “‘There’s going to be a challenge’ and ‘what you say will be taken very, very seriously.’”

Sen. Mike Lee (R., Utah), a former lawyer specializing in appellate and Supreme Court litigation, testified . . . “You have my assurance that I and my Republican colleagues will continue to explore and attempt to exhaust every available option” . . . .

Yesterday, Several members of the Senate Banking Committee, including Senator Roger Wicker (MS), boycotted the testimony of President Obama’s non-recess appointee to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Richard Cordray. Of the members who attended Cordray’s first Senate hearing, some expressed concern over the legitimacy of his appointment and whether any actions he takes will withstand legal scrutiny. Senator Mike Johanns (NE) stated, “If we accept the premise of your validity in this position, . . . then we accept the premise that our ability to offer advice and consent basically disappears, because the President can determine when we're in recess and not in recess, and just appoint whoever.”

We will continue to keep you informed as we work with Congress on this issue.

Latest in
Constitution

Opposing California’s Unconstitutional Laws

By Edward White1523634594046

Recently, the State of California passed several laws designed to advance California’s open-borders agenda and status as a sanctuary state. These laws, for example, restrict voluntary cooperation with federal immigration agents by employers and state and local law enforcement agencies when it comes...

read more

Maximum Pressure on Congress

By Nathanael Bennett1522680986404

In what the White House has described as a “ maximum pressure ” strategy, the Trump Administration has tightened sanctions on North Korea , strengthened trade relations with South Korea, and put China on notice for its proclivity to use U.S. technology for a military or economic advantage. These...

read more

California Violating the Constitution

By Edward White1522092407382

The State of California recently passed laws designed to shield illegal aliens residing in California from workplace enforcement actions conducted by federal immigration agents. To stop these new laws, the Trump Administration filed a federal lawsuit , and the American Center for Law and Justice...

read more

Taking on California’s Lawless Agenda

By Harry G. Hutchison1520863200000

The long-simmering battle between the federal government and the state of California’s lawless agenda has erupted as part of escalating conflict last week after the Justice Department filed a lawsuit seeking to strike down the state’s attempt to usurp federal authority and write its own immigration...

read more