President Obama Can't Set Senate Rules | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Jay Sekulow1334783491000

It's an important case that underscores the separation of powers. Senate Republicans will file a friend-of-the-court brief in support of a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of recent recess appointments by President Obama - specifically to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

Here's the problem. The president made those appointments while the Senate was in pro-forma session. The fact is the Senate was not in recess, and the president's so-called "recess" appointments represented a constitutional overreach.

As I told Megyn Kelly on FOX News today, the Senate is part of a co-equal branch of government that is entitled to set its own rules, and the president simply can't step in and override them.

You can watch the interview here.

What's important to note, as I underscored in my interview on FOX, President Bush made recess appointments when he was in the White House. But the fact is he never overrode the Senate and its own rules. He understood that when the Senate was in session, he was not permitted to make "recess appointments."

In announcing the move to file an amicus brief challenging the president's unconstitutional recess appointments, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell put it this way:

"The President’s decision to circumvent the American people by installing his appointees at a powerful federal agency, when the Senate was not in recess, and without obtaining the advice and consent of the Senate, is an unprecedented power grab. We will demonstrate to the Court how the President’s unconstitutional actions fundamentally endanger the Congress’s role in providing a check on the excesses of the executive branch." 

Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) told reporters he is "glad" that Senate Republicans are getting involved in the case. "The Senate should decide when the Senate is in session," Sen. Blunt stated.

This is a very significant case. We are now in the process of conducting an in-depth review of this case and will make a determination shortly on whether we will file an amicus brief challenging the president's appointments in this case. I will keep you posted.

Jay Sekulow


Latest in

Why Obama's Plans Are Unconstitutional

By Jay Sekulow1447358134239

President Obama has a penchant for presidential power plays. He has been following his own playbook since January 2014 when he declared: “I’ve got a pen, and I’ve got a phone” – his promise to do all that he could to bypass Congress – relying on Executive Orders and actions instead of legislation.

read more

Not for President or Congress, Why Vote?

By Matthew Clark1446588501654

Another election day is upon us, but for many the question lingers: Why vote? Many of you reading this may even be asking, there’s an election today? No, the President isn’t on the ballot, neither are the members of the U.S. House or Senate. Unless you live in Kentucky, Louisiana, or Mississippi,

read more

A Felony in the Clinton Email Scandal

By Matthew Clark1445266450583

The FBI is reportedly focusing its investigation into Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s email scandal on a particular federal law governing “gross negligence” in handling national defense secrets. As I explained this summer, this felony, 18 U.S.C § 793, could be the most legally...

read more

Winning Victories for Faith & Freedom

By ACLJ.org1438285554928

For years, the ACLJ has fought—and continues to fight—to defend your Constitutionally protected freedoms. Your support allows us to fight for the lives of the unborn, defend the Constitution, and protect the religious liberties of all U.S. citizens. Here are a few of the victories that you’ve...

read more