President Obama Can't Set Senate Rules | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

By Jay Sekulow1334783491000

It's an important case that underscores the separation of powers. Senate Republicans will file a friend-of-the-court brief in support of a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of recent recess appointments by President Obama - specifically to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

Here's the problem. The president made those appointments while the Senate was in pro-forma session. The fact is the Senate was not in recess, and the president's so-called "recess" appointments represented a constitutional overreach.

As I told Megyn Kelly on FOX News today, the Senate is part of a co-equal branch of government that is entitled to set its own rules, and the president simply can't step in and override them.

You can watch the interview here.

What's important to note, as I underscored in my interview on FOX, President Bush made recess appointments when he was in the White House. But the fact is he never overrode the Senate and its own rules. He understood that when the Senate was in session, he was not permitted to make "recess appointments."

In announcing the move to file an amicus brief challenging the president's unconstitutional recess appointments, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell put it this way:

"The President’s decision to circumvent the American people by installing his appointees at a powerful federal agency, when the Senate was not in recess, and without obtaining the advice and consent of the Senate, is an unprecedented power grab. We will demonstrate to the Court how the President’s unconstitutional actions fundamentally endanger the Congress’s role in providing a check on the excesses of the executive branch." 

Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) told reporters he is "glad" that Senate Republicans are getting involved in the case. "The Senate should decide when the Senate is in session," Sen. Blunt stated.

This is a very significant case. We are now in the process of conducting an in-depth review of this case and will make a determination shortly on whether we will file an amicus brief challenging the president's appointments in this case. I will keep you posted.

Jay Sekulow


 

Latest in
Constitution

The Confirmation of Conservative Judges

By Nathanael Bennett1519398000000

One of the most important duties entrusted to our President and Senators is nominating and confirming competent and qualified judges for the federal courts. This task has a multi-generational impact, as federal judges serve a life-long tenure—sometimes spanning more than half a century—and will...

read more

Tax Reform is Working for Middle-Class Americans

By Harry G. Hutchison1516631437327

One of the largest successes of the last year is undoubtedly tax reform. The massive tax cuts package passed by Congress and signed by the President is a remarkable achievement – the largest tax cuts and simplification of the often bewildering tax code in decades. Indeed, whether it is tax reform,

read more

Conservative Judicial Nominations Update

By ACLJ.org1513616634820

At the ACLJ, we have been aggressively fighting for conservative judges on the federal bench. Over the last few months we have helped achieve unprecedented success. One of the most important duties facing a President and the U.S. Senate is the nomination and confirmation of federal judges. The...

read more

Senate Removes Obstacle to Conservative Judges

By ACLJ.org1507822161934

Senator Mitch McConnell (KY), the Senate Majority leader, has heard our demand for action and reform. He has just removed an archaic procedural rule that has been misused by the left to block conservative federal judicial nominees from ever getting a vote—or even a hearing. It is called the Senate...

read more