ACLJ & 20 Members of Congress Urge Federal Appeals Court to Keep Montana War Memorial in Place | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

1399491409000

(Washington, DC) – The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), which focuses on constitutional law, today filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to uphold a lower court decision that cleared the way for a statue of Jesus to remain as part of a World War II memorial on a Montana mountain.

In its amicus brief, posted here, the ACLJ represents itself along with 20 members of Congress and nearly 115,000 Americans.

“The history and heritage of our nation should not create a constitutional crisis,” said Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the ACLJ. “The lawsuit challenging this memorial was deeply flawed from the start and a federal court correctly dismissed it last summer. Now, the atheist organization is appealing. This is nothing but another attempt to manipulate the constitution. The fact is – this memorial honoring the men and women of WWII – is not only an integral part of the history and heritage of this area, but is without question constitutional. We’re hopeful the appeals court will make that determination as well.”

In June 2013, a federal district court dismissed the suit filed by the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) – concluding the memorial did not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

The atheist group filed suit calling the memorial “a ruse and a sham” and demanding the National Forest Service remove the display. A federal judge rejected that argument by concluding that “The statue does not convey to a reasonable informed observer that the government, rather than a private party, endorses Christianity over any other faith or the absence of faith.” The judge added: “[T]he Court finds that the renewal of the Special Use Permit does not constitute a government endorsement of a religious message and thus does not violate the Establishment Clause.”

Part of a war memorial on Big Mountain at Whitefish Mountain Resort in Montana since the 1950s, the statue was inspired by monuments the soldiers – who were also members of the Knights of Columbus – saw in the mountains of Europe during the war.

In the brief filed with the appeals court, the ACLJ contends that the lower court was correct in its finding and urged the 9th circuit court to keep the memorial in place.

According to the brief, the ACLJ argues that “. . . the Knights of Columbus’s Memorial has remained an established part of the Whitefish Mountain ski resort for sixty years. There is no evidence of any impermissible purpose on the part of the National Forest in granting the permit. . . .the Memorial is not the site of religious services, and its ski resort setting does “not readily lend itself to meditation or any other religious activity.” Van Orden, 545 U.S. at 702; see generally ER 388-94. The Memorial is secluded and not easily accessible to the public. It is nowhere near any government structure, and was intended to be and is now seen as a historical landmark honoring WWII veterans. No reasonable observer would discover in it a government endorsement of religion.”

The ACLJ represents 20 members of Congress in the brief: Steve Daines, J. Randy Forbes, Senator James Inhofe, Michele Bachmann, Jeff Duncan, Virginia Foxx, Gregg Harper, Vicky Hartzler, Tim Huelskamp, Bill Johnson, Walter Jones, Mike Kelly, Steve King, John Kline, James Lankford, Jeff Miller, Joe Pitts, Mike Pompeo, Lynn Westmoreland, and Robert Pittman are currently serving in the One Hundred Thirteenth Congress. 

Also represented, nearly 115,000 Americans – members of the ACLJ’s Committee to Defend the Jesus Statue War Memorial who support veterans’ memorials and who oppose efforts to strip from public property recognitions of history and heritage that contain religious symbolism.

Led by Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow, the American Center for Law and Justice focuses on constitutional law and is based in Washington, D.C.

Latest in
Constitution

JSL: The Conclusion of the Mueller Investigation

By Jordan Sekulow1553552211929

After nearly two years, 19 lawyers assisted by 40 FBI agents, more than 2,800 subpoenas, 13 requests to foreign governments, and 500 witness interviews, Special Counsel Robert Mueller just gave his report to the Attorney General. The summary: NO COLLUSION. NO OBSTRUCTION. On today’s broadcast, my...

read more

JSL: The Left’s Supreme Court Litmus Test

By Jay Sekulow1553110826052

Yesterday, we told you how the left is desperately trying to concoct radical new ways to shift the balance of power in their favor. On today’s show, we discussed the new plan for 2020 by the Left, which is retake the majority in the Senate and the White House – and then pack the Supreme Court.

read more

JSL: 2020 Hopefuls Present Radical Ideas

By Jordan Sekulow1553024140660

The left has a new litmus test for any would-be 2020 Presidential candidates – do they stand in favor of “court packing” in order to tip the Supreme Court in its favor? Today on the show, we discussed this radical new vetting process for the left, among other radical ideas being put forth by...

read more

JSL: Use of Constitutional Option to Avoid Shutdown?

By Jay Sekulow1545422706672

Will Senate Republicans have to “go nuclear” in order to secure our border and avoid a government shutdown? Today on the show we discussed the possibility of Senate Republicans having to exercise the so-called nuclear option, or what I call simply “the Constitutional option,” that would only...

read more