ECLJ Addresses Islamic "Anti-Defamation" Agenda at United Nations | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion


By Jay Sekulow1308675985000


GENEVA Our European Centre for Law and Justice (ECLJ) delivered an oral statement before the Human Right Council of the United Nations (U.N.) on September 23, 2008 on the issues of Defamation of Religions and Islamophobia.  The Human Right Council of the U.N. has been the setting for a growing debate between pro-democratic and Islamic countries regarding the freedom of religion and expression.  At issue is a disturbing new report entitled Combating Defamation of Religions - a concept being advocated by the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) - a number of countries led by Pakistan, Algeria, and Egypt. The concepts of defamation of religion and Islamophobia, designed to legally forbid any criticism of Islam, have been promoted since September 2001 in the framework of the U.N. Durban Declaration and Action Programme on Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance.


The Islamic countries argue that, since the terrorist attacks in the United States on September 11, 2001, there has been a serious upsurge in discrimination and violence against Muslims and Arab peoples in most areas of the world because Islam is identified with terrorism.  According to the Islamic countries, and based on the report submitted by the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Racism, Muslims face much more discrimination and violence than any other religious group.  The U.N. report glaringly omitted any reference to the growing persecution of Christians worldwide and the massive Christian exodus from Middle Eastern countries.


In his oral statement, our ECLJ representative, Grgor Puppinck, explained why the OIC concept of Defamation of Religions is in a frontal conflict with the international conventions on human rights. In fact, an international recognition of the concept of defamation of religions would straighten the arsenal of repressive laws directed against of the religious minorities, mostly Christians in Islamic countries. Specifically, the implementation of domestic laws to combat defamation of religion in many OIC countries reveals a selective and arbitrary enforcement toward religious minorities, who are often Christians.  Those violations are frequently punishable by the death penalty.


We contend the OIC-backed report on defamation of religions raises additional concerns because its primary focus and concern involves the protection of ideas and religions generally, rather than protecting the rights of individuals to practice their religion, which is the chief purpose of international religious freedom law.  Our oral statement was presented in French, but you can read an English translation of the remarks here. You can also watch the oral presentation here (scroll down to European Centre for Law and Justice and click on English).  In June, the ECLJ submitted a detailed legal analysis on this issue to the U.N. High Commissioner of Human Rights. You can read the analysis here.


The European Centre for Law and Justice (ECLJ) is an international law firm focusing on the protection of human rights and religious freedom in Europe and worldwide.  The ECLJ is affiliated with the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) which focuses on protecting religious freedom in the United States. Attorneys for the ECLJ have served as counsel in numerous cases before the European Court of Human Rights.  Additionally, the ECLJ has special Consultative Status with ECOSOC of the United Nations, and is accredited to the European Parliament.

Time to Reform the United Nations

By Harry G. Hutchison1505850311447

This week President Trump took his robust agenda for reform to the United Nations (U.N.). President Trump said : “ … I am confident that if we work together and champion truly bold reforms, the United Nations will emerge as a stronger, more effective, more just and greater force for peace and...

read more

Continuing Anti-Israel Bias at UN

By Skip Ash1444338806822

Once again the United Nations (U.N.) has made a bad situation worse, issuing reckless statements in the wake of more jihadist murders of Israeli civilians. We’re taking direct action. Following closely on the heels of the recent public renunciation of the Oslo Accords by Palestinian Authority...

read more

Implications of the Palestinian...

By Skip Ash1443732176771

On September 30, 2015, Mahmoud Abbas, President of the Palestinian Authority, addressed the UN General Assembly in his role as “President of Palestine.” In his UN address , Mr. Abbas recited his rendition of the history of Palestine and, as he so often does, accused Israel of all manner of...

read more

Rouhani Spikes Nuclear Football

By Matthew Clark1443472533367

Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani spiked the nuclear football in his U.N. victory speech in New York this afternoon. Complete with threats against the “Zionist Regime” (Israel), blaming the U.S. for ISIS’s dominance in the Middle East, and empty promises about its nuclear ambitions, the president of...

read more