Confused Left-wingers’ Reckless Attacks on Judge Amy Coney Barrett Driven by a Confused Understanding of “Court Packing” | American Center for Law and Justice

Confused Left-wingers’ Attacks Show Confusion On “Court Packing”

By Harry G. Hutchison1603116000000

Amid the breathless, reckless, and unjustified attacks on Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination to the United States Supreme Court, many left-wing commentators have fallen all over themselves in a desperate attempt to block the nomination of one of the most superb Supreme Court candidates in American history.

Two commentators, as part of a cattle drive which is gaining traction among left-wingers seeking to either block or diminish the importance of President Trump’s nominee, contrary to their previous position, now argue that the attempt to confirm Judge Barrett justifies Court packing. Other unrestrained commentators argue that Republicans have been packing the courts ever since President Trump took office, simply by nominating federal district and federal appellate judges throughout the United States. Nothing could be further from the truth.

They are confusing “court packing” with filling a vacancy on any court. One is aimed at changing the ideological makeup of a court, i.e., adding additional seats to the Supreme Court in order to fill them with fellow left-wingers. The other is simply fulfilling the constitutional role of nominating and confirming judges and justices to fill empty seats that already exist on the courts.

Imagine this: The Left is outraged and prepared to lose its collective mind, when and if a conservative President and the U.S. Senate fulfill their constitutional duty to fill vacancies either on the Supreme Court or on the lower courts. This move represents outrageous and highly retrograde analysis. Not content with the many bogus claims prowling the Internet, Eric Holder, former Attorney General during the Obama Administration, offers this illogical tweet: “This is court packing.” He made this claim last week referring to the Senate Judiciary Committee’s intention to hold a committee vote on Kathryn Mizelle, a Trump nominee for the position of U.S. District Judge for the Middle District of Florida. While Eric Holder was never a great Attorney General, he has now proven beyond question that he has difficulty understanding our constitutional republic.

Such claims by Holder and others are becoming more hysterical and more falsifiable, each and every day. The American people are right to reject Holder and other commentators’ version of revisionist history that conveniently forgets that President Obama nominated hundreds of individuals for vacant federal judgeship during his tenure as president. While some left-wing commentators rightly note that court packing is a dangerous game, they now believe that because President Trump is willing to fulfill his constitutional duty, that Court packing is the best way to restore the Supreme Court’s legitimacy. Such sophomoric analysis is exactly backwards. Previously, even Joe Biden, the Democrat Party nominee, has called Court packing—the attempt to add justices in order to dilute the tilt of the Court — nothing less than a “bonehead idea.”

It still is. Join us in supporting the rule of law and the confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett.

Confirm Judge Barrett to the Supreme Court Now

Supreme Court  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly Tax-Deductible gift.

As we vigorously fight at the Supreme Court & on Capitol Hill, we need your support. Have your Tax-Deductible gift to defend the Constitution DOUBLED today. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from the ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.
Latest in
Supreme Court

Two Major Decisions From the Supreme Court

By Jordan Sekulow1625174268255

Two major victories issued today at the Supreme Court have set the precedent for upholding the integrity of our elections. The first case was related to Arizona election rules that prohibit third parties from collecting mail-in ballots (also known as ballot harvesting) and disallow votes that were...

read more

Biden’s Court-Packing Commission Unconcerned With the Constitution

By Jordan Sekulow1620914340000

Packing the Supreme Court would be one of the most radical acts ever carried out by a U.S. President. In fact, not since 1937 when President Franklin D. Roosevelt wanted to add six seats to the Supreme Court has any President seriously considered this far-reaching act. When FDR first tried this, he...

read more

Is President Biden Planning To Pack the Supreme Court?

By Harry G. Hutchison1618581540000

In 1937, President Franklin Roosevelt’s (FDR) effort to expand the power of the federal government at the expense of individual liberty and federalism was blocked by the United States Supreme Court’s Originalist reading of the Constitution. As a result, he instead initiated a plan to pack the Court...

read more

Radical Left in Congress Announce Bill to Pack the Supreme Court

By Jordan Sekulow1618519163771

The radical Left has announced a plan to pack the Supreme Court by hostile takeover . The radical Left in Congress, led by Representative Jerry Nadler (NY) and Senator Ed Markey (MA), are circumventing President Biden – who we just told you announced an Executive order to appoint a commission to...

read more

American Center for Law and Justice | Washington D.C. | Copyright © 2021, ACLJ | Privacy & Security Policy | Annual Report

The ACLJ is an organization dedicated to the defense of constitutional liberties secured by law.

Visit ACLJ.org/help to submit a legal help request. All legal requests submitted via any other method cannot be answered.

Through our $1 Million Matching Challenge, all gifts will be doubled, dollar-for-dollar, up to the online daily total.

American Center for Law and Justice is a d/b/a for Christian Advocates Serving Evangelism, Inc., a tax-exempt, not-for-profit, religious corporation as defined under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, specifically dedicated to the ideal that religious freedom and freedom of speech are inalienable, God-given rights. The Center's purpose is to engage legal, legislative and cultural issues by implementing an effective strategy of advocacy, education and litigation to ensure that those rights are protected under the law. The organization has participated in numerous cases before the Supreme Court, Federal Court of Appeals, Federal District Courts, and various state courts regarding freedom of religion and freedom of speech. Your gift is very much appreciated and fully deductible as a charitable contribution. A copy of our latest financial report may be obtained by writing to us at P.O. Box 90555, Washington, DC 20090-0555.