The Left Attacks Christian Judicial Nominees: Christians Need Not Apply | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

The Left Attacks Christian Judicial Nominees

By Jay Sekulow1504880005237

Two leftist Senators just attacked one of President Trump’s judicial nominees because she is a Christian. This is anti-Christian bigotry. The message of the Left is clear: Christians need not apply. This behavior was unacceptable in 1776, and it is unconstitutional today. Being a Christian should never disqualify anyone from public office. We demand an apology. We demand an end to this unconstitutional bigotry.

President Donald Trump nominated the highly qualified Notre Dame Law Professor Amy Coney Barrett for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Among her many accolades, Professor Barrett clerked for the late Justice Antonin Scalia on the U.S. Supreme Court. She also happens to be a devout, pro-life Roman Catholic.

Earlier this week, Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Dick Durbin (D-IL) turned a routine Senate Judiciary Committee hearing for Professor Barrett into a religious inquisition. Senator Feinstein called Professor Barrett’s Christian faith a “concern” and snidely declared that “the dogma lives loudly within you.” Senator Durbin insultingly asked if Professor Barrett considered herself “an orthodox Catholic” and refused to accept her answer.

Think about that for a minute. Two senior U.S. Senators attacked a Christian woman’s faith in an open hearing, mocking her beliefs and outright insinuating that she was unfit to serve on the bench because she dared to be a Christian.

This kind of bigoted, anti-Christian discrimination has no place in the U.S. Senate.

So just what was so concerning and dogmatic to Senator Feinstein? Professor Barrett’s conclusion, in a twenty-year-old law review article, that Catholic judges who have a deeply held religious belief in the sanctity of all life, from birth to death, and who are concerned about the moral implications of imposing the death penalty should recuse themselves from death penalty cases at sentencing. A mainline Catholic belief. How scandalous.

Professor Barrett never said Catholic teaching should supplement the law or that her faith should have any bearing on the outcome of a case. In fact, she said the exact opposite: “It is never appropriate for a judge to apply their personal convictions, whether it derives from faith or personal conviction.” What Professor Barrett said was absolutely legally and constitutionally correct. That’s the ethical standard.

By attacking Professor Barrett for her faith, Senators Feinstein and Durbin turned the Constitution on its head.  The Constitution is crystal clear: “no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

Yet, even after the hearing, Senator Durbin maintained “that going into a persons religion is not the right thing to do in every circumstance” but it was in this case. That’s absurd and constitutionally ignorant. Judging someone’s fitness for office based on their religion is “not the right thing to do” in any circumstance. Period.

Imagine if Professor Barrett was an Orthodox Jew, a Hindu, a Buddhist, or a Muslim. Imagine the utter outrage of the Left.  But because she is a Christian, it’s ok? Outrageous.

But unfortunately, this is not the first time the Left has put a Christian nominee for public office on trial for their faith. On June 7, 2017, Senator Bernie Sanders (D-VT) declared Russell Vought, President Trump’s nominee to become the Deputy Director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, unfit for office. Why? Vought’s Christian faith. Senator Sanders accused Vought of Islamophobia because of an article he wrote saying that Jesus Christ is necessary for salvation. Apparently, the mere act of believing in Christ is grounds to bar someone from public office.

It is almost as if the Left has never heard of Article VI of the Constitution or Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Maybe they just don’t believe those protections apply to Christians. Such anti-Christian bigotry and political hypocrisy is dangerous. We must not allow it to continue.

We demand Senator Feinstein and Senator Durbin apologize to Professor Barrett and to the American people. They have violated her rights and this nation’s first freedom: the freedom of religion. No American may be denied public office solely on account of their faith.

Let me be clear. The Left’s anti-Christian bigotry will fail. Professor Barrett, a highly qualified candidate for the federal bench, will soon be Judge Barrett. The American people will not stand for this blatant religious bigotry. It’s time we speak out. Take action with us.

The Left’s utter disdain for Christians will not be tolerated any longer.

Stop Senate Bigotry Against Christian Judges

Religious Liberty  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we battle to stop bigoted anti-Christian Senate attacks on judges, we urgently need your support. Donate to defend Christian judges today.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.

FFRF Delivers Threats Against Public Officials Offering Prayer

By Christina Stierhoff1598990088874

During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, we noted the disgraceful way that Freedom From Religion Foundation (“FFRF”) was attacking local officials who had invoked a day of prayer during the national emergency. FFRF sent threatening letters to governors and mayors, attempting to silence their First...

read more

ACLJ Files for Preliminary Injunction in California’s Singing Ban

By Jordan Sekulow1595941200000

Churches in California have been forced into silence. The ACLJ just filed a critical motion to stop the enforcement of the unjust ban and give churches back their voices. The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment states it pretty clear: “Congress shall make no law . . . prohibiting the free...

read more

ACLJ Files Injunction Motion in California Church Singing Ban Case

By Jordan Sekulow1595886289760

The ACLJ fights back against California’s church singing ban. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live , we discussed our filing for an injunction to block the enforcement of California’s arbitrary church singing bang. The ACLJ is taking decisive action to fight for religious liberty. It happened on Friday...

read more

JSL: ACLJ Files Suit Challenging California Church Singing Ban

By Jordan Sekulow1594936464130

The ACLJ files a major lawsuit in California, challenging Governor Gavin Newsom’s ban on singing and chanting in churches and other places of worship. On today’s Jay Sekulow Live , we discussed the actions that we at the ACLJ are taking to fight California’s ban on singing in churches. We have...

read more