Freedom From Religion Foundation Loses Again: Appeals Court Upholds Display of WWII Heroes Memorial Jesus Statue | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

WWII Memorial Jesus Statue Upheld

By Jay Sekulow1441138022027

Yesterday, we helped deliver a stunning defeat to angry atheists attempting to tear down a war heroes’ memorial.

We have been fighting to defend the World War II memorial statue of Jesus against the angry atheists at the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) on behalf of more than 100,000 Americans and concerned Members of Congress for years.

Yesterday, the anti-Christian FFRF lost once again in court. This time, they had attacked the statue of Jesus in Montana.  The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that this statue atop Big Mountain, adjacent to a ski resort, did not violate the Establishment Clause.

The Knights of Columbus built and maintained the statue as a World War II memorial in the 1950s, inspired by similar monuments the soldiers saw in the European Alps during the war.  The National Forest Service had granted permission to the Knights of Columbus to maintain the statue on a small tract of federal land within the privately owned ski resort for over 60 years before the Freedom From Religion Foundation demanded its removal.

In a six-page opinion, the court repudiated FFRF’s challenge to the historic war memorial, ruling that:

(1) There is nothing in the statue's display or setting to suggest government endorsement; the twelve-foot tall statue is on a mountain, far from any government seat or building, near a commercial ski resort, and accessible only to individuals who pay to use the ski lift; (2) the statue's plaque communicates that it is privately owned and maintained: it did not sprout from the minds of government officials and was not funded from the government's coffers," (3) besides the statue's likeness, there is nothing in the display or setting to suggest a religious message. The mountain's role as a summer and winter tourist destination used for skiing, hiking, biking, berry-picking, and site-seeing suggests a secular context; the location does not readily lend itself to meditation or any other religious activity, and the setting suggests little or nothing of the sacred.

The court also held that the statue’s religious nature did not call into question the Forest Service’s primary purpose in renewing the land use permit, which was the preservation of a historic monument.

The ACLJ filed an amicus brief on behalf of 20 Members of the 113th Congress and nearly 115,000 Americans.  The Members of Congress were Representatives Steve Daines, J. Randy Forbes, Michele Bachmann, Jeff Duncan, Virginia Foxx, Gregg Harper, Vicky Hartzler, Tim Huelskamp, Bill Johnson, Walter Jones, Mike Kelly, Steve King, John Kline, James Lankford, Jeff Miller, Joe Pitts, Mike Pompeo, Lynn Westmoreland, Robert Pittman, and Senator James Inhofe. 

Our brief argued that FFRF’s suit was meritless because “the Memorial was not an attempt to “set the imprimatur of the state on a particular creed.” Salazar v. Buono, 559 U.S. 700, 715 (2010) (plurality). Rather, those who erected the Memorial purposed to honor the soldiers of the Tenth Mountain Division. Removing the sixty-year-old Memorial per FFRF’s veto would demonstrate constitutionally impermissible hostility towards religion.”

The anti-Christian FFRF is not backing down. They are vowing to appeal to the entire Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. As they seek en banc review, we will be there to continue our fight to defend the U.S. Constitution, our American heritage, and the war heroes who erected this historic memorial.

The heroes of the Greatest Generation who fought to preserve freedom in the world do not deserve to have their memory disgraced by tearing down a war memorial replicating the Jesus statues that gave them hope and solace as they made the ultimate sacrifice for freedom.

In addition to this extremist attack on our nation’s veterans, FFRF has launched a new campaign to denigrate and destroy the chaplaincy programs at major universities.  This direct, anti-Christian assault on religious liberty on campus and the chaplains that provide religious mentorship to those who voluntarily desire it must not stand.

We’re preparing to send critical legal letters to these universities defending religious liberty against these unwarranted angry atheist attacks.  You can add your name to our letter below.

Defend Religious Freedom on Campuses

Religious Liberty  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

Only through your generous support can we continue defending religious freedom on campus. Take action and have your gift doubled today.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.

Four Years of Trump Admin Advancing Global Religious Freedoms

By Olivia Summers1612295160971

While President Biden has now taken office, and we are focused on working to ensure his Administration protects religious freedom across the globe, it is important to understand the gains we’ve made in the last four years – what we must build upon in our advocacy for the persecuted Church. On...

read more

ACLJ Files in Worship Ban Lawsuit Detailing Critical New Precedent

By Erik Zimmerman1611069119146

The ACLJ represents three churches in a lawsuit challenging California’s ban on all singing and chanting at indoor worship services throughout the state. We recently filed a supplemental brief asking the court to prevent California from enforcing the ban while the case moves forward. In an earlier...

read more

Writing the Book On Religious Freedom in the Workplace

By Geoffrey Surtees1609434987026

Does a person of faith have to leave his religious commitments at home when he enters the workplace? Does he have to place job duties ahead of his religious ones? What if an employer assigns a task that would require one to violate one’s religious beliefs? Unfortunately, far too many people (both...

read more

Do Jurors Have To Stop Praying? – ACLJ Files Brief Defending Prayer

By Jordan Sekulow1607444071671

This is a case involving fundamentals – fundamental tenets of what it means to be a U.S. citizen and fundamental beliefs of Christians and many other religious faiths. Fundamental to American civics is the right of citizens to vote, and often with that right comes the responsibility of serving on a...

read more