For years the ACLJ has defended religious organizations against discrimination. That includes churches and Christian schools.
The Tree of Life Christian School has been forbidden by the local government from developing a building and property it acquired for a new school in order to consolidate its four separate campuses.
The City of Upper Arlington, Ohio has insisted through 8 years of litigation that the building bought by Tree of Life Christian School must house commercial activity to generate tax revenue, even though the City’s zoning code does not require it, and the City would readily allow other non-profit activity at the site.
This case seems to be a clear violation of the Equal Terms provision of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Person Act (RLUIPA). The equal terms provision states that local zoning authorities should not treat religious assemblies or institutions “on less than equal terms with a nonreligious assembly or institution.”
Yet somehow, in 7 separate opinions, the district court and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled for the City. The Sixth Circuit joined four other Circuits that have refused to enforce RLUIPA’s straight-forward equal-terms provision.
Even though Congress intended that the provision be enforced liberally to protect religious freedom, many courts have added language to the statute and watered it down so much that it is seldom enforced as Congress intended. Three Circuits interpret the Equal Terms provision more closely to how Congress intended. Thus, the Circuits are currently hopelessly divided on the proper application of the Equal Terms provision.
In the law, this is known as a circuit split, and we are hopeful that the Supreme Court will take this case to resolve this issue to protect churches and religious institutions from discrimination. The case is Tree of Life Christian Schools v. City of Upper Arlington, Ohio, and we are preparing to file an amicus (friend-of-the-court) brief in the case.
We’ve been battling governmental discrimination against churches for years, including landmark wins at the Supreme Court. We’re aggressively fighting in a number of RLUIPA cases right now.
One such case arises out of South Carolina. ACLJ represents two churches that have been prevented from occupying new properties and holding worship services due to an illegal and discriminatory provision in the City zoning ordinance.
We sent a letter to the Gaffney, SC Planning Commission reminding them of RLUIPA’s requirements and urging the city to lift this unjust provision from its ordinance.
However, as we recently told you, the city is stonewalling.
In light of RLUIPA’s clear prohibition on unequal treatment of religious organizations, the ACLJ’s legal letter to City officials demanded that the City remove the illegal provision and allow the churches to continue with their plans to lease buildings in the CC district. The City responded by encouraging our client churches to submit a proposal to amend the ordinance, so we did.
However, at the first hearing on the proposed amendment . . . the City’s Planning Commission attempted to justify the illegal provision and voted 3-2 to keep the illegal provision.
Now our request for amendment of the ordinance is slated to be heard by the Gaffney City Council on February 11, 2019. Our legal team will represent the two churches at that hearing. We will provide an update once the City Council has reached its decision.
The ACLJ is prepared to file a lawsuit in the event the City Council, like the Planning Commission, votes to uphold this illegal provision.
In the case of Tree of Life Christian Schools, we are preparing to file an amicus brief in support of the school’s petition before the February 15th Supreme Court deadline.
We will not tolerate bureaucratic discrimination against churches, or Christian schools.
As we defend churches from targeted discrimination and harassment at the Supreme Court, your gift – of any size – will be DOUBLED today. Have your gift doubled through our Matching Challenge.
The American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) has filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting school choice. The ACLJ amicus brief urges the Supreme Court to grant review in the case of Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue . At issue is the constitutionality of including – or excluding –
It’s important to never forget where we started, or why. The ACLJ was founded to defend our constitutional rights and religious liberty. On today’s show, we discussed what I like to call a couple of “old school” ACLJ cases, including a win for religious liberty in school. I used to say that public...
As the ACLJ continues the fight to remove Buddhist mindfulness practices from our public schools, we are happy to report a recent positive development. Within the past couple of months, we counseled a parent in Missouri on speaking with administrators at his child’s school about mindfulness. After...
As you’ve probably read , over the past few months, the ACLJ has been fighting to remove Buddhist meditation practices from public schools. Simply put, these meditation practices are religious and teach children dangerous ideas about faith, right versus wrong, and identity. More and more parents...