The radical atheists at the Freedom from Religion Foundation (FFRF) are at it again.
This time, they are using their scare tactics and false arguments about the U.S. Constitution to challenge some of the most successful college football programs in the nation days before the new college football season begins.
They have sent legal letters to these schools telling them to get rid of their chaplaincy: Auburn University, University of Georgia, University of South Carolina, Mississippi State University, University of Alabama, University of Tennessee, Louisiana State University, University of Missouri, University of Washington, Georgia Institute of Technology, University of Illinois, Florida State University, University of Mississippi, University of Wisconsin, and Clemson University.
The Freedom from Religion Foundation holds themselves out as protectors of “the constitutional principle of separation between state and church [and] represent[ing] the views of freethinkers (atheists, agnostics, and nonbelievers.)”
But as we’ve discovered at the ACLJ as we continue to successfully combat the unconstitutional attacks from the Freedom from Religion Foundation, these atheists are anything but freethinkers. They do not support freethinking. Instead, they attack things they don’t like, such as chaplains for football teams where adults voluntarily agree to participate in faith-based events and meetings.
The outrageous claims from FFRF’s report are too many to list in just one article, but here is an assortment:
For those of you keeping score at home, FFRF is calling football team chaplains “religious discrimination" and players and coaches praying together an "unholy alliance". The ACLJ has successfully defeated FFRF claims like these before because the Constitution does not mean what the FFRF thinks it means.
What does FFRF’s so-called “model policy” recommend? Hiring a counselor who can provide secular advice and life guidance. Just as they’ve done before, the FFRF attacks traditional faiths and wants to replace them with their radical, leftist, secular orthodoxy.
The FFRF is threatening lawsuits against some of these football programs. But the FFRF only wins when they scare schools and public institutions with these letters. Whenever they go to court – whether it’s to attack the Pledge of Allegiance in schools or In God We Trust on our money – they lose. Some federal judges agree with them from time to time, but eventually their arguments are found to be unconstitutional.
In their letter to Auburn, the Freedom from Religion Foundation argues that “it makes no difference if the chaplain is unofficial, not school-sponsored, or a volunteer.” But that’s simply not what the law and the Constitution say.
Many of these top college football programs are also fighting back against FFRF’s lies. The Washington Post has details:
The FFRF report claimed that Williams “has an office in [Auburn’s Jordan-Hare] stadium,” but according to AL.com, that office is actually in the athletics department’s student development center. Auburn released this statement Thursday:
“Chaplains are common in many public institutions, including the US Congress. The football team chaplain isn’t an Auburn employee, and participation in activities he leads are voluntary.”
Here at the ACLJ, we are fighting back. We are preparing comprehensive legal letters to let each of these college football programs know what their Constitutional rights are. We are fighting the angry atheist attacks on every front. We are standing up for the Constitution and for the religious rights of football players from coast to coast as the new season begins.
While President Biden has now taken office, and we are focused on working to ensure his Administration protects religious freedom across the globe, it is important to understand the gains we’ve made in the last four years – what we must build upon in our advocacy for the persecuted Church. On...
The ACLJ represents three churches in a lawsuit challenging California’s ban on all singing and chanting at indoor worship services throughout the state. We recently filed a supplemental brief asking the court to prevent California from enforcing the ban while the case moves forward. In an earlier...
Does a person of faith have to leave his religious commitments at home when he enters the workplace? Does he have to place job duties ahead of his religious ones? What if an employer assigns a task that would require one to violate one’s religious beliefs? Unfortunately, far too many people (both...
This is a case involving fundamentals – fundamental tenets of what it means to be a U.S. citizen and fundamental beliefs of Christians and many other religious faiths. Fundamental to American civics is the right of citizens to vote, and often with that right comes the responsibility of serving on a...