ACLJ Files Amicus Brief Urging Supreme Court To Hear Case Involving the Illinois Governor’s Attempt To Practically Shut Down Religious Worship During the Pandemic | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

ACLJ Urges Supreme Court to Hear Case Involving Illinois Governor

By Laura Hernandez1606932811436

Earlier this week, the ACLJ filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the Supreme Court in Elim Romanian Pentecostal Church v. Pritzker, another case in which state officials have imposed discriminatory restrictions on religious worship in the name of protecting against the Coronavirus.  As we have reported here, many states have attempted to fight the Coronavirus pandemic by clamping down on religious worship. One would think that the virus’s favorite victims are the religiously devout.

Like so many other leftist government officials, the governor of Illinois issued an Order that singled out churches for worse treatment than other comparable organizations.  On top of that, the Order restricted in-person worship services to 10 persons within churches but allowed unlimited numbers to assemble in the same building for other purposes. The Order permitted church members to provide meals and shelter for an unlimited number of people but religious services for only 10 of those same people. One hundred people could eat a meal in the church but only 10 could receive communion. When church members were providing secular services, they could serve, for example, 100 people. But once a religious worship service began, 90 of those same people had to leave.

The lower court upheld that irrational and unconstitutional arrangement.  Our amicus brief urged the Supreme Court to issue a summary reversal of the lower court’s ruling. The Court will summarily reverse when a lower court ignores an established principle of law.  No oral argument is held.

Our brief argues:

The Free Exercise Clause forbids laws with the object of suppressing religious worship or imposing a special disability on religious practice. Order 32’s religious gerrymander accomplishes both. . . .The Order blatantly targets religious worship for third class treatment by subjecting it to a unique disability inapplicable to all the other activities in the churches. Secular activities are permissible without any numerical limit on persons attending but religious worship is restricted to ten persons. Under Lukumi, Order 32’s religious gerrymander cannot survive strict scrutiny.

As Justice Alito recently said, “in certain quarters, religious liberty is fast becoming a disfavored right.” Many government officials have exploited the pandemic to impose previously unimaginable restrictions on religious worship.  With your help, the ACLJ will continue its fight against the erosion of religious liberty.

We are heartened by the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in a church case out of New York where it struck down similar discriminatory Coronavirus restrictions imposed on churches. We will also continue to battle in our own lawsuit against California’s ban on singing in church.

Don’t Ban Singing in Church

Religious Liberty  Signatures

LOGIN

Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

$20
$40
$60
$120
$240
Make this a monthly tax-deductible gift.

As we defend your religious liberty from the overreach of the radical Left and protect the right to sing in church, we need your support. Donate today.

Email Address is required.
First Name is required.
Last Name is required.
Credit Card Number is required.
Verification Code is required.
Expiration Month is required.
Expiration Year is required.
Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.
Encourage your friends to sign and donate by sharing this petition.

ACLJ Files in Worship Ban Lawsuit Detailing Critical New Precedent

By Erik Zimmerman1611069119146

The ACLJ represents three churches in a lawsuit challenging California’s ban on all singing and chanting at indoor worship services throughout the state. We recently filed a supplemental brief asking the court to prevent California from enforcing the ban while the case moves forward. In an earlier...

read more

Writing the Book On Religious Freedom in the Workplace

By Geoffrey Surtees1609434987026

Does a person of faith have to leave his religious commitments at home when he enters the workplace? Does he have to place job duties ahead of his religious ones? What if an employer assigns a task that would require one to violate one’s religious beliefs? Unfortunately, far too many people (both...

read more

Do Jurors Have To Stop Praying? – ACLJ Files Brief Defending Prayer

By Jordan Sekulow1607444071671

This is a case involving fundamentals – fundamental tenets of what it means to be a U.S. citizen and fundamental beliefs of Christians and many other religious faiths. Fundamental to American civics is the right of citizens to vote, and often with that right comes the responsibility of serving on a...

read more

Supreme Court Blocks Discriminatory COVID-19 Restrictions on Churches

By Harry G. Hutchison1607114881485

The Supreme Court last week made a major move in upholding America’s constitutional norms, including the importance of the First Amendment’s protection of the free exercise of religion. Last week, the Court blocked enforcement of Governor Cuomo’s hyper-restrictive and highly discriminatory rules...

read more