ACLJ: COURT RULING - COLLEGE RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION IN MARYLAND CASE CAN MOVE FORWARD | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Religious Discrimination Case Approved

1427229951699

In a victory for religious freedom, a Maryland district court ruled in favor of moving forward in the case of a student denied college admission because of his religious beliefs. Brandon Jenkins of Bel Air, Maryland, is one of two students who were rejected from the Radiation Therapy Program at the Community College of Baltimore County (CCBC) after expressing religious viewpoints during the admissions process. College officials, including the program director, sought to have the case dismissed, but a judge ruled Friday, March 20, that the case should proceed.

Representing Jenkins, the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed its initial lawsuit last April against the CCBC officials for religious discrimination. ACLJ attorneys also filed suit in a separate case involving Dustin Buxton, another prospective student.

Despite having credentials that surpass the program’s standards for qualified, competitive candidates, Jenkins was told by CCBC Program Director Adrienne Dougherty:

“I understand that religion is a major part of your life and that was evident in your recommendation letters, however, this field [radiation therapy] is not the place for religion… If you interview in the future, you may want to leave your thoughts and beliefs out of the interview process.”

In an opinion issued last week, the court agreed with ACLJ’s arguments against dismissal, recognizing that “if it is true that a preference for ‘nonreligion,’ or for ‘nonreligious’ candidates, did actually cause Dougherty to deny Jenkins admission to the RTP [Radiation Therapy Program], …[s]uch a decision would…be an unconstitutional preference.”

Jenkins’ attorney Carly Gammill, ACLJ’s litigation counsel in the case, reacted to the court’s decision: “Turning away a qualified applicant from a public education program because he is open about his religious faith confounds not only basic constitutional principles but also simple logic. The notion that an individual’s faith somehow diminishes his ability to practice in the medical field cannot be squared with reality or, when espoused by the government, the First Amendment.”

Gammill also noted that the ACLJ may appeal a troubling decision by the court to dismiss Mr. Jenkins' claim that his denial of admission served as a penalty for his expression of a religious viewpoint: “The dismissal of the free speech claim by the court was flawed. The court’s conclusion that the government does not violate free speech rights when it bases academic admissions decisions on a religious viewpoint expressed by a candidate threatens to establish dangerous precedent that we may ask the Fourth Circuit to review and correct. That issue aside, we are encouraged that the court recognized the obvious and inherent problems with government decision-making based on the desire to scrub programs of religious adherents and that we are able to move forward with this suit on behalf of Mr. Jenkins.”

The ACLJ represents Jenkins, along with fellow prospective student Buxton, in defending their right as private citizens to adhere to their Christian faith without fear of discrimination from the government.

Led by Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow, the American Center for Law and Justice focuses on constitutional law and is based in Washington, D.C.

The Constitution and Discrimination of Religious Choices

By Walter M. Weber1555594361458

The American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) has filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting school choice. The ACLJ amicus brief urges the Supreme Court to grant review in the case of Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue . At issue is the constitutionality of including – or excluding –

read more

JSL: Defending the Bible in Public Schools

By Jay Sekulow1554404108108

It’s important to never forget where we started, or why. The ACLJ was founded to defend our constitutional rights and religious liberty. On today’s show, we discussed what I like to call a couple of “old school” ACLJ cases, including a win for religious liberty in school. I used to say that public...

read more

The Deception of Buddhist-Based Mindfulness in Our Schools

By Christina Stierhoff1553697779810

As the ACLJ continues the fight to remove Buddhist mindfulness practices from our public schools, we are happy to report a recent positive development. Within the past couple of months, we counseled a parent in Missouri on speaking with administrators at his child’s school about mindfulness. After...

read more

Digging into Buddhist-Based Indoctrination in Schools

By Christina Stierhoff1551196568881

As you’ve probably read , over the past few months, the ACLJ has been fighting to remove Buddhist meditation practices from public schools. Simply put, these meditation practices are religious and teach children dangerous ideas about faith, right versus wrong, and identity. More and more parents...

read more